We performed a comparison between Riversand MDMCenter and TIBCO EBX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Master Data Management (MDM) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Has a good user interface and the ability to update large sets of products quickly."
"I like their matching feature, and the survivorship rules are very strong. I also like their out-of-box reports, data quality dashboards, and more. Those are also very handy and helpful. Internally, I like the kind of configurations that we can create, validations, and enhancements. Those configurations are pretty straightforward and useful. It's a user-friendly tool that is very cool."
"It's a stable solution. I have no complaints."
"The data quality is very good."
"The API and the data model are very valuable features."
"The initial setup is easy and straightforward."
"The most valuable features of TIBCO EBX are that is a complete tool and everything can be done inside, including data governance. We are able to model everything according to the needs of the company. If the company needs five people to agree to a change in data, they can do it with TIBCO EBX. They can model it with any particular rules. Additionally, there is dynamic data modeling, simple workflows using the GUI that comes from the server."
"The most valuable features of TIBCO EBX are the workflow and interface."
"The tool's UI is good and easy to understand."
"There are a lot of possible use cases for this Master Data Management tool."
"This solution allows the user to have complete control, and is 100% customizable."
"Integration could be better. Riversand is majorly focusing on only the MDM hub part. They don't have their own integration platform. We have to rely on a third-party integration partner. They say this is the format, and it's the client's responsibility to bring the data into their required format. They have to have an integration partner and develop their integration capabilities. It's not so flexible to read any data format or system, for example, SAP. They don't have a connector."
"The solution does not have a good match and search capability."
"The ability to create bespoke workflows could be improved."
"The product does not scale well horizontally. We find the scalability to be quite inferior to other options."
"We would like to see the community an documentation for this solution be developed. At present there is very little tutorial documentation available, and limited community support for issues with the product."
"Currently, users can't use Plain SQL queries in TIBCO EBX."
"TIBCO EBX could improve by making the building of rules less complex and the repository is not robust."
"The tool has to improve mapping and workflow. It should be made more robust."
"The initial setup can be a bit complex."
"The design should be easier and more visual."
"In terms of improvements that this solution needs, it should support big data."
Riversand MDMCenter is ranked 7th in Master Data Management (MDM) Software with 3 reviews while TIBCO EBX is ranked 3rd in Master Data Management (MDM) Software with 14 reviews. Riversand MDMCenter is rated 8.4, while TIBCO EBX is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Riversand MDMCenter writes "Updates large sets of products quickly; provides good off-the-shelf functionality". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO EBX writes "Good workflow models and pull-down lists with very good data modeling". Riversand MDMCenter is most compared with Stibo STEP MDM, Informatica MDM, SAP Master Data Governance and Reltio Cloud, whereas TIBCO EBX is most compared with Informatica MDM, SAP Master Data Governance, Reltio Cloud, Stibo STEP MDM and Informatica PIM. See our Riversand MDMCenter vs. TIBCO EBX report.
See our list of best Master Data Management (MDM) Software vendors.
We monitor all Master Data Management (MDM) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
