We performed a comparison between Original Software Qualify and PractiTest based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites."Flexible software with multiple functions, e.g. scenario deployment, new entity creation, workflow creation, etc. Technical support for this software is very good."
"The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."
"The reporting engine of Original Software Qualify AQM needs to change. It's very difficult to develop complex reports. Its reporting function needs improvement."
"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."
Original Software Qualify is ranked 35th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites while PractiTest is ranked 20th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Original Software Qualify is rated 9.0, while PractiTest is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Original Software Qualify writes "Flexible, multifunctional, and stable testing software with good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PractiTest writes "Offers one click graphical dashboard reports and advanced customization". Original Software Qualify is most compared with , whereas PractiTest is most compared with TestRail, Jira, Zephyr Enterprise and Microsoft Azure DevOps.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.