We performed a comparison between Original Software Qualify and TFS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites."Flexible software with multiple functions, e.g. scenario deployment, new entity creation, workflow creation, etc. Technical support for this software is very good."
"The most valuable features of TFS are bug reporting and its high performance."
"I feel that the test plan and test tools are more manageable in TFS."
"Good branching and labelling features."
"TFS’s test management capability without the expensive licensing has large gaps. Users will be unable to access performance testing and coded UI testing capabilities."
"The tool's installation is straightforward."
"The work item feature is most valuable. It allows us to store all product requirements. We can also link the test cases to those requirements so that we know which feature has already been tested, and which one is waiting for testing. We can also couple the code reviews, unit tests, and automated tests into these requirements. It is reliable. It has all the features and good performance. It also has reporting tools or analysis tools."
"It is easy to push our changes from quality to pre-prod and prod."
"It has great functionality: work items, backlogs, source code, build releases, and it's easy to use."
"The reporting engine of Original Software Qualify AQM needs to change. It's very difficult to develop complex reports. Its reporting function needs improvement."
"The manageability and performance of the product are areas of concern where improvements are required."
"There's not automatic access to test case management and execution."
"TFS should allow more integration with different platforms."
"This solution is quite old and it is already being bundled as Azure DevOps Server."
"The solution should have better dashboards."
"It would be better if we could bring it out on the cloud."
"TFS needs to be stable."
"TFS's CI/CD, project pipelines, and management development could be improved."
Earn 20 points
Original Software Qualify is ranked 35th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites while TFS is ranked 3rd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 93 reviews. Original Software Qualify is rated 9.0, while TFS is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Original Software Qualify writes "Flexible, multifunctional, and stable testing software with good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TFS writes "It is helpful for scheduled releases and enforcing rules, but it should be better at merging changes for multiple developers and retaining the historical information". Original Software Qualify is most compared with , whereas TFS is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Rally Software, Visual Studio Test Professional and OpenText ALM / Quality Center.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.