Compare Osirium vs. Symantec Privileged Access Manager

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
536,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
130
Comparisons
109
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
4,043
Comparisons
2,769
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
249
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
CA PAM, Xceedium Xsuite, CA Privileged Access Manager
Learn More
Overview

Osirium protects organisations by securing and simplifying the complexities of privileged user management in multi-vendor infrastructures.

CA Privileged Access Manager is a simple-to-deploy, automated, proven solution for privileged access management in physical, virtual and cloud environments. It enhances security by protecting sensitive administrative credentials such as root and administrator passwords, controlling privileged user access, proactively enforcing policies and monitoring and recording privileged user activity across all IT resources.  It includes CA PAM Server Control (previously CA Privileged Identity Manager) for fine-grained protection of critical servers

Offer
Learn more about Osirium
Learn more about Symantec Privileged Access Manager
Sample Customers
Mental Health Concern, M-Netics, NHS, Thinkmoney
NEOVERA, Telesis, eSoft
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm21%
Retailer16%
Logistics Company16%
Government11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider26%
Government9%
Financial Services Firm8%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business28%
Midsize Enterprise5%
Large Enterprise67%
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, One Identity, Thycotic and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: September 2021.
536,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Osirium is ranked 19th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) while Symantec Privileged Access Manager is ranked 10th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 1 review. Osirium is rated 0.0, while Symantec Privileged Access Manager is rated 0.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Privileged Access Manager writes "Great features that provide comprehensive coverage of what's required for the PAM solution". Osirium is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Thycotic Secret Server, whereas Symantec Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, ARCON Privileged Access Management, ForgeRock and BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.