Compare Osirium vs. Thycotic Secret Server
Use Osirium? Share your opinion.
 | Bohumil Glac Analytické a bezpečnostní nástroje IBM at ITS |
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, One Identity, Thycotic and others in Privileged Access Management. Updated: March 2021.
475,208 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Information Not Available
"The price of this solution is good."
"Pricing is comparable to competing products."
"The pricing is standard in this business and we have no complaints about it."
"Its price is okay. We don't compete on pricing. We seldom use price to win over our competitors. We prefer it this way because if we can sustain the price, we make more margin as well. We don't want the price to go down to the bottom where despite the win, there's no margin at all."
"Secret Server is expensive when compared to the cost to some alternatives."
"There are different plans and additional licensing costs that can be instituted for add-ons."
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
475,208 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Top Answer: This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpoint… more »
Top Answer: It is able to manage storage and use of personal passwords.
Top Answer: I think that Secret Server is expensive when I compare the cost to some alternatives. There are different plans and additional licensing costs that can be added on, but I do not know the details… more »
Views
132
Comparisons
109
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
10,966
Comparisons
7,356
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
492
Rating
8.1
Compared 59% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Osirium protects organisations by securing and simplifying the complexities of privileged user management in multi-vendor infrastructures.
Secret Server is a fully-featured Privileged Access Management (PAM) solution available both on premise and in the cloud. It empowers security and IT ops teams to secure and manage all types of privileged accounts and offers the fastest time to value of any PAM solution.
Learn more about Osirium
Learn more about Thycotic Secret Server
Mental Health Concern, M-Netics, NHS, Thinkmoney
Secure-24, University of San Diego, International Rescue Committee, San Francisco Ballet, Perkins Coie, University of San Diego, D.S.S. Limited, Turbo's Hoet, Eclipse Computing, Cathay Bank, Stellarise, J&R Consulting
No Data Available
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider18%
Government6%
Financial Services Firm5%
No Data Available
Small Business31%
Midsize Enterprise31%
Large Enterprise38%
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, One Identity, Thycotic and others in Privileged Access Management. Updated: March 2021.
475,208 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Osirium is ranked 16th in Privileged Access Management while Thycotic Secret Server is ranked 3rd in Privileged Access Management with 9 reviews. Osirium is rated 0.0, while Thycotic Secret Server is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Thycotic Secret Server writes "Excellent access management that can serve very large networks". Osirium is most compared with CyberArk PAS, whereas Thycotic Secret Server is most compared with CyberArk PAS, HashiCorp Vault, Microsoft Azure Key Vault, IBM Security Secret Server and BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.