OutMatch vs Work.com comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Harver Logo
39 views|33 comparisons
Salesforce Logo
4 views|2 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OutMatch and Work.com based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Workday, SAP, Oracle and others in Talent Acquisition.
To learn more, read our detailed Talent Acquisition Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is that they have several competency models."

More OutMatch Pros →

"We have found value in Work.com because it gave us a central place for capturing any opportunities-related information, such as client-related information. Additionally, it is a place for storing this information. Anyone in the organization, if it was being updated actively by the people or by the sales team, could have access to it. Once the contact information is there about any client, then it stays there. If you are approaching a client, you are able to check if there's any history. It's a good tool, but it all depends on how disciplined the sales team is in entering the information regularly."

More Work.com Pros →

Cons
"When it comes to understanding personality, the models are not dynamic enough. They use old, obsolete or outdated terminology. In general, they need to be updated."

More OutMatch Cons →

"I found Work.com a bit clunky. There were too many fields, but maybe that was the design. It could be company-specific to me. There were overlapping fields and sometimes it was confusing."

More Work.com Cons →

Ranking
19th
out of 32 in Talent Acquisition
Views
39
Comparisons
33
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
4
Comparisons
2
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
289
Rating
7.0
Buyer's Guide
Talent Acquisition
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Workday, SAP, Oracle and others in Talent Acquisition. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

You depend on your people to drive your company’s mission and purpose. Who you hire, how you develop them, and how you care for your culture are THE MOST important decisions you can make for the future of your business.

OutMatch helps you put a strategy around these decisions. By truly understanding your candidates, your culture, and the underlying behaviors that drive employee success, you can expect to see an average workforce transformed into a high-growth, high-performance company.

Today_s workplace requires a new approach to performance management. Rypple is a web-based social performance management platform that helps companies improve performance through social goals, continuous feedback and meaningful recognition.
Sample Customers
Adidas, American Airlines, Delta, Caterpillar, The Children's Place, Circle K, Dollar General, Hard Rock Cafe
Varsity Spirit
Buyer's Guide
Talent Acquisition
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Workday, SAP, Oracle and others in Talent Acquisition. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

OutMatch is ranked 19th in Talent Acquisition while Work.com is ranked 6th in Sales Performance Management. OutMatch is rated 7.0, while Work.com is rated 6.4. The top reviewer of OutMatch writes "Good work-related personality survey, but it needs to be updated". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Work.com writes "Centralized management, useful information storage, but can feel clunky". OutMatch is most compared with , whereas Work.com is most compared with Workday.

We monitor all Talent Acquisition reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.