We performed a comparison between OutMatch and Work.com based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Workday, SAP, Oracle and others in Talent Acquisition."The most valuable feature is that they have several competency models."
"We have found value in Work.com because it gave us a central place for capturing any opportunities-related information, such as client-related information. Additionally, it is a place for storing this information. Anyone in the organization, if it was being updated actively by the people or by the sales team, could have access to it. Once the contact information is there about any client, then it stays there. If you are approaching a client, you are able to check if there's any history. It's a good tool, but it all depends on how disciplined the sales team is in entering the information regularly."
"When it comes to understanding personality, the models are not dynamic enough. They use old, obsolete or outdated terminology. In general, they need to be updated."
"I found Work.com a bit clunky. There were too many fields, but maybe that was the design. It could be company-specific to me. There were overlapping fields and sometimes it was confusing."
OutMatch is ranked 19th in Talent Acquisition while Work.com is ranked 6th in Sales Performance Management. OutMatch is rated 7.0, while Work.com is rated 6.4. The top reviewer of OutMatch writes "Good work-related personality survey, but it needs to be updated". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Work.com writes "Centralized management, useful information storage, but can feel clunky". OutMatch is most compared with , whereas Work.com is most compared with Workday.
We monitor all Talent Acquisition reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.