We performed a comparison between OutSystems and QuickBase based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Speed of delivery: We were able to reduce development time by 30%."
"I find it to be a genuinely cool and effective platform for my development needs."
"The flow editor is the most valuable feature. It is simple and intuitive, and it can guide you step-by-step."
"Refactoring with TrueChange is very simple."
"We used almost all of the features, themes, styling guide, and approach components. They are useful in our applications."
"OutSystems is easy to use."
"I really like the one-click publish feature in OutSystems. In other development tools/languages, it's not as easy. I also like how easily I can manage all my projects in one place."
"Their out-of-the-box UI is quite good."
"I am impressed with the product's automation which makes everything easy."
"Considering factors like functionality and price, the product proves to be worth the investment."
"There's a lot of stability in QuickBase...I really appreciate the processing part of QuickBase, especially considering how we're able to get information in real time instead of having to wait."
"QuickBase reminds me when a software license or a hardware support contract is near expiration so that I can initiate our company's procurement process in time and not miss a deadline."
"The reporting tool: It helps in data analytics to provide the solution more efficiency."
"It provides a well-organized method for overseeing everything, especially considering the remote work aspect."
"QuickBase is an excellent product and it is very easy to get support."
"Allows users have anytime/anywhere access."
"The solution's testing framework needs to be improved, and the workflow should be slightly more mature."
"One of the biggest areas for improvement is that every time an existing data element is modified, it creates a new data element. It doesn't really modify that particular data element. So, a user has to follow an extra step of removing the existing data element and bringing in the new and modified data element that is being added, which sort of goes into negative productivity."
"I have difficulty in using several new features. Some of the product's features are tricky to use as well."
"The latest version of the app generation tools could be more user-friendly."
"The product's high price is an area of concern, where improvements are required."
"It needs improvement in the AI capability."
"The PDD framework can't be used for the behavioral-driven development way of working."
"There are many tutorials available but they are very basic and good for learning the platform. To develop an enterprise-grade application, advanced tutorials need to be developed to help IT professionals design/develop high-quality/performance applications."
"The improved developer interface in some areas can be difficult to use for complex items."
"This rule: The Maximum is 60 rules. We need to provide more in order to improve."
"Its UI needs improvement. They should improve it and make it a little bit more modern. We should also be able to have more real-time information that connects with other software platforms. It has an open API, but it doesn't always connect with some of the other platforms that we would like to utilize. These are probably two of the biggest things for us, and hopefully, they will keep ensuring that in the future, they continually build QuickBase to be a little bit more efficient in that regard."
"Unfortunately, there is still no new report formatting available natively, and would still require 3rd party developers to help with that. ."
"Third-party integration -- they are working on it and I find their brand-new still-in-beta Webhooks very promising."
"The mobile app has improved, but it still needs work."
"I would like to see better options for producing paper reports from Quick Base, rather than viewing things exclusively on screen."
"There is room for improvement in terms of user-friendliness."
OutSystems is ranked 3rd in Rapid Application Development Software with 46 reviews while QuickBase is ranked 15th in Rapid Application Development Software with 73 reviews. OutSystems is rated 8.4, while QuickBase is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of OutSystems writes "The visual program provides the advantage of only requiring one skill set for both the front and backend ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QuickBase writes "Reliable, user-driven platform, that is scalable". OutSystems is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Appian, Mendix, ServiceNow and Ionic, whereas QuickBase is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Oracle Fusion Service, Sales Creatio, ServiceNow and Mendix. See our OutSystems vs. QuickBase report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
