Compare OWASP Zap vs. Qualys Web Application Scanning

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Veracode Logo
67,668 views|36,295 comparisons
OWASP Zap Logo
28,628 views|20,240 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about OWASP Zap vs. Qualys Web Application Scanning and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
438,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The reporting being highly accurate is pretty cool. I use another product and I was always looking for answers as to what line, which part of the code, was wrong, and what to do about it. Veracode seems to have a solid database to look things up and a website to look things up.""Veracode's cloud-based approach, coupled with the appliance that lets us use Veracode to scan internal-only web applications, has provided a seamless, always-up-to-date application security scanning solution.""The source composition analysis component is great because it gives our developers some comfort in using new libraries.""Integrations into our developer's IDE (Greenlight) and the DevOps Pipeline SAST / SourceClear Integrations has particularly increased our time to market and confidence.""Veracode is a valuable tool in our secure SDLC process.""We used it for performing security checks. We have many Java applications and Android applications. Essentially it was used for checking the security validations for compliance purposes.""I have used this solution in multiple projects for vulnerability testing and finding security leaks within the code.""The most valuable feature comes from the fact that it is cloud-based, and I can scale up without having to worry about any other infrastructure needs."

More Veracode Pros »

"The interface is easy to use.""Simple to use, good user interface.""Automatic updates and pull request analysis.""The scalability of this product is very good.""The reporting is quite intuitive, which gives you a clear indication of what kind of vulnerability you have that you can drill down on to gather more information.""The OWASP's tool is free of cost, which gives it a great advantage, especially for smaller companies to make use of the tool.""This solution has improved my organization because it has made us feel safer doing frequent deployments for web applications. If we have something really big, we might get some professional company in to help us but if we're releasing small products, we will check it ourselves with Zap. It makes it easier and safer.""It can be used effectively for internal auditing."

More OWASP Zap Pros »

"It is easy to use.""It is a very stable solution.""The feature that I have found most valuable is the progressive scan. It is good. It's done in 24 hours.""The interface is user-friendly and easy to understand.""The simplicity of exporting reports and the simplicity and clarity of the reports included with the product are good.""With our vulnerabilities under control, it's putting our services in compliance and minimizing our risk for exposure.""The most valuable feature is that we are able to scan the services and put credentials like a user ID password. We can verify the vulnerability level."

More Qualys Web Application Scanning Pros »

Cons
"The triage indicator was kind of hard to find. It's a very small arrow and I had no idea it was there.""One feature I would like would be more selectivity in email alerts. While I like getting these, I would like to be able to be more granular in which ones I receive.""I think for us the biggest improvement would be to have an indicator when there's something wrong with a scan.""Improve Mobile Application Dynamic Scanning DAST - .ipa and .apk""It needs better controls to include/exclude specific sections when creating a report that can be shared externally with customers and prospects.""One of the things that we have from a reporting point of view, is that we would love to see a graphical report. If you look through a report for something that has come back from Veracode, it takes a whole lot of time to just go through all the pages of the code to figure out exactly what it says. We know certain areas don’t have the greatest security features but those are usually minor and we don’t want to see those types of notifications.""Ideally, I would like better reporting that gives me a more concise and accurate description of what my pain points are, and how to get to them.""I would like to see expanded coverage for supporting more platforms, frameworks, and languages."

More Veracode Cons »

"The documentation needs to be improved because I had to learn everything from watching YouTube videos.""Too many false positives; test reports could be improved.""Deployment is somewhat complicated.""I prefer Burp Suite to SWASP Zap because of the extensive coverage it offers.""I'd like to see a kind of feature where we can just track what our last vulnerability was and how it has improved or not. More reports that can have some kind of base-lining, I think that would be a good feature too. I'm not sure whether it can be achieved and implement but I think that would really help.""The automated vulnerability assessments that the application performs needs to be simplified as well as diversified.""There's very little documentation that comes with OWASP Zap.""If there was an easier to understand exactly what has been checked and what has not been checked, it would make this solution better. We have to trust that it has checked all known vulnerabilities but it's a bit hard to see after the scanning."

More OWASP Zap Cons »

"The reporting contains too many false positives.""The virus code updates are not frequent enough.""Deployment can be complicated.""The UI is not user-friendly and you don't have a yearly reporting facility where you can slice and dice in different jobs.""The scanner reports a lot of false positives, which is something that needs to be improved.""The pricing does not seem to be competitive.""The solution needs to adjust its pricing. They should make it more affordable.""It should have better automatic reporting."

More Qualys Web Application Scanning Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"I don't really know about the pricing, but I'd say it's worth whatever Veracode is charging, because the solution is that good.""For the value we get out of it, coupled with the live defect review sessions, we find it an effective value for the money. We are a larger organization.""They have just streamlined the licensing and they have a number of flexible options available, so overall it is quite good, albeit pricey.""They just changed their pricing model two weeks ago. They went from a per-app license to a per-megabyte license. I know that the dynamic scan was $500 per app. Static analysis was about $4500 yearly. The license is only for the number of users, it doesn't matter what data you put in there. That was the old model. I do not know how the new model works.""Veracode has been fair. We use their SaaS solution and it's just an annual subscription.""No issues, the pricing seems reasonable."

More Veracode Pricing and Cost Advice »

"This is an open-source solution and can be used free of charge.""This app is completely free and open source. So there is no question about any pricing.""OWASP Zap is free to use.""It's free. It's good for us because we don't know what the extent of our use will be yet. It's good to start with something free and easy to use."

More OWASP Zap Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The cost is $30,000 USD for one year to cover WAS (Web Application Security) and the VM (Virtual Machine) security in a company with 200 employees.""There are different options available with respect to licensing.""The product is expensive, at least initially, in comparison to other products in this category."

More Qualys Web Application Scanning Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
438,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Answers from the Community
Mahesh Khopade
author avatarMijail Marin
User

por ahora estoy usando Owasp Zap, es muy intuitivo y sus reportes muy detallados, probe con burp suite pero no me convencio por el cosoto

Questions from the Community
Top Answer: JaeLee, check out our comparison page here of Veracode vs Checkmarx… more »
Top Answer: I would recommend Veracode. Our uses cases included removing vulnerable code from our Product and ensuring the product… more »
Top Answer: SonarQube depends on completely what you configure the Rules. You will have the option of the Profile creation and can… more »
Top Answer: por ahora estoy usando Owasp Zap, es muy intuitivo y sus reportes muy detallados, probe con burp suite pero no me… more »
Top Answer: Automatic updates and pull request analysis.
Top Answer: The product is somewhat complicated and could be improved by simplifying it because you don't want to have to allocate… more »
Top Answer: The interface is user-friendly and easy to understand.
Top Answer: There are different options available with respect to licensing.
Top Answer: The reporting needs to be improved because there are a lot of search parameters, and at the end of the day, the reports… more »
Popular Comparisons
Compared 51% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 63% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Also Known As
Qualys WAS
Learn
Veracode
OWASP
Qualys
Overview

Veracode covers all your Application Security needs in one solution through a combination of five analysis types; static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition analysis, interactive application security testing, and penetration testing. Unlike on-premise solutions that are hard to scale and focused on finding rather than fixing, Veracode comprises a unique combination of SaaS technology and on-demand expertise that enables DevSecOps through integration with your pipeline, and empowers developers to find and fix security defects.

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is a free, open-source penetration testing tool being maintained under the umbrella of the Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP). ZAP is designed specifically for testing web applications and is both flexible and extensible.

Qualys Web Application Scanning (WAS) is a cloud service that provides automated crawling and testing of custom web applications to identify vulnerabilities including cross-site scripting (XSS) and SQL injection. The automated service enables regular testing that produces consistent results, reduces false positives, and easily scales to secure a large number of websites. Proactively scans websites for malware infections, sending alerts to website owners to help prevent black listing and brand reputation damage.
Offer
Learn more about Veracode
Learn more about OWASP Zap
Learn more about Qualys Web Application Scanning
Sample Customers
State of Missouri, Rekner
Information Not Available
BskyB, Cartagena, ClearPoint Learning Systems, Connect Group, du, Fortrex Technologies, HBOR, HDI, Highlights for Children, The Lithuanian State Enterprise Centre of Registers, City of Miami Beach, Microsoft, MidlandHR, MSCI Inc., Northern Arizona University, Ofgem, Olympus Europa, PhoneFactor, RTL Nederland, ThousandEyes, VGZ Organisatie B.V.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm37%
Insurance Company13%
Consumer Goods Company7%
Healthcare Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company44%
Comms Service Provider11%
Media Company6%
Insurance Company5%
REVIEWERS
Aerospace/Defense Firm14%
Energy/Utilities Company14%
Manufacturing Company14%
Marketing Services Firm14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company47%
Comms Service Provider11%
Media Company8%
Government5%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm50%
Comms Service Provider13%
Pharma/Biotech Company13%
Recruiting/Hr Firm13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company45%
Government9%
Comms Service Provider7%
Insurance Company7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise54%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise69%
REVIEWERS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise56%
REVIEWERS
Small Business11%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise79%
Find out what your peers are saying about OWASP Zap vs. Qualys Web Application Scanning and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
438,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.
OWASP Zap is ranked 6th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 9 reviews while Qualys Web Application Scanning is ranked 15th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 6 reviews. OWASP Zap is rated 7.6, while Qualys Web Application Scanning is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of OWASP Zap writes "Inexpensive licensing, free to use, and has good community support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualys Web Application Scanning writes "Has comprehensive SSL security measurements but the price should be lowered". OWASP Zap is most compared with PortSwigger Burp, Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner, HCL AppScan, WebInspect and Micro Focus Fortify on Demand, whereas Qualys Web Application Scanning is most compared with SonarQube, HCL AppScan, WebInspect, PortSwigger Burp and Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner. See our OWASP Zap vs. Qualys Web Application Scanning report.

See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.