Compare Palo Alto Network Cortex XSOAR vs. ThreatQ

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Find out what your peers are saying about Critical Start, Palo Alto Networks, Splunk and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR). Updated: December 2020.
455,536 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable features are simplicity and ease of integration.""The automation part and the playbook creation part are awesome. The way it is responding to the customers and incidents is also very good. In the SOC environment, I guess it will carry out around 50% of the work."

More Palo Alto Network Cortex XSOAR Pros »

"The reporting services are great. With reporting services, if you have customers that just visit a URL you can see the result - including why it's blocked and how and how the URL was first recognized as malicious."

More ThreatQ Pros »

Cons
"Implementing this solution requires a lot of involvement from the vendor and it should be made easier for the partners.""For building automation, there is not a lot of good documentation. The documentation is there, but it is not very good from my perspective. There should be an improvement in this area. I don't see issues with anything else. In terms of new features, I have heard that other products have EBA functionality. It would be good if this functionality could be added."

More Palo Alto Network Cortex XSOAR Cons »

"The solution should be simpler for the end-user in terms of reporting and navigating the product."

More ThreatQ Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"There is a perception that it is priced very high compared to other solutions.""From the cost perspective, I have heard that its price is a bit high as compared to other similar products."

More Palo Alto Network Cortex XSOAR Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
455,536 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable features are simplicity and ease of integration.
Top Answer: There is a perception that it is priced very high compared to other solutions.
Top Answer: Implementing this solution requires a lot of involvement from the vendor and it should be made easier for the partners. It has to be richer with respect to IoT. I expect that in future versions… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
10,750
Comparisons
9,070
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
318
Rating
8.0
Views
1,314
Comparisons
1,013
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
767
Rating
7.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 42% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Also Known As
Demisto Enterprise, Cortex XSOAR, Demisto
Learn
Palo Alto Networks
ThreatQuotient
Video Not Available
Overview

Demisto Enterprise delivers a complete solution that helps Tier-1 through Tier-3 analysts and SOC managers to optimize the entire incident life cycle while auto documenting and journaling all the evidence. More than 100+ integrations enable security orchestration workflows for incident management and other critical security operation tasks.

ThreatQ is a Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) designed to enable threat operations and management. ThreatQ is the only solution with an integrated Threat Library, Adaptive Workbench and Open Exchange that help you to act upon the most relevant threats facing your organization and to get more out of your existing security infrastructure.

Offer
Learn more about Palo Alto Network Cortex XSOAR
Learn more about ThreatQ
Sample Customers
Cellcom Israel, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City, esri, Cylance, Flatiron Health, Veeva, ADT CybersecurityRadar, Bitdefender, Crowdstrike, FireEye, IBM Security
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider18%
Media Company8%
Government6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider18%
Financial Services Firm11%
Real Estate/Law Firm6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Critical Start, Palo Alto Networks, Splunk and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR). Updated: December 2020.
455,536 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Palo Alto Network Cortex XSOAR is ranked 2nd in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 2 reviews while ThreatQ is ranked 10th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 1 review. Palo Alto Network Cortex XSOAR is rated 8.0, while ThreatQ is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Network Cortex XSOAR writes "Very scalable, awesome automation, and awesome technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatQ writes "Good reporting and pretty stable but needs to be simpler to use". Palo Alto Network Cortex XSOAR is most compared with Splunk Phantom, ServiceNow Security Operations, Fortinet FortiSOAR, IBM Resilient and Siemplify, whereas ThreatQ is most compared with ThreatConnect, Recorded Future, IntSights, ReversingLabs Titanium Platform and EclecticIQ.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.