Compare Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus vs. RADARK

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Recorded Future, Group-IB and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Updated: May 2021.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is alerting.
Top Answer: At times in AutoFocus, when you have a homegrown application or you check another threat intelligence feed, it's not malicious but is still categorized as gray. We need to request a change in the… more »
Top Answer: We are using AutoFocus with my playbooks. We use it on a daily basis. We receive alerts on the Playbook. We receive alerts for threat intelligence, malware alerts, and virus alerts. We use Autofocus… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
1,104
Comparisons
749
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
385
Rating
8.0
Views
169
Comparisons
72
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
KELA RADARK
Learn More
Overview

AutoFocus contextual threat intelligence service accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Unique, targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.

KELA provides intelligence by using an automated technology, which monitors a curated set of Darknet sources, providing fully targeted, actionable intelligence. All threats are analyzed and qualified by KELA's analysts, ensuring all intelligence is 100% actionable.

Offer
Learn more about Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Learn more about RADARK
Sample Customers
Telkom Indonesia
Canadian Bank, US Corporate, Japanese Automobile Company
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider21%
Computer Software Company19%
Insurance Company9%
Media Company8%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Recorded Future, Group-IB and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Updated: May 2021.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is ranked 12th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 3 reviews while RADARK is ranked 24th in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is rated 8.0, while RADARK is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus writes "Identifies critical attacks, easy to use, stable, and integrates well ". On the other hand, Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is most compared with LogRhythm NextGen SIEM, Cisco Threat Grid, Trend Micro Deep Discovery, ThreatStream and Recorded Future, whereas RADARK is most compared with Recorded Future.

See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.