Ram BalajiPre-sales Engineer at VFM Systems And Services
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Earn 20 points
AutoFocus contextual threat intelligence service accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Unique, targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.
KELA provides intelligence by using an automated technology, which monitors a curated set of Darknet sources, providing fully targeted, actionable intelligence. All threats are analyzed and qualified by KELA's analysts, ensuring all intelligence is 100% actionable.
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is ranked 12th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 3 reviews while RADARK is ranked 24th in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is rated 8.0, while RADARK is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus writes "Identifies critical attacks, easy to use, stable, and integrates well ". On the other hand, Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is most compared with LogRhythm NextGen SIEM, Cisco Threat Grid, Trend Micro Deep Discovery, ThreatStream and Recorded Future, whereas RADARK is most compared with Recorded Future.
See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.