We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus vs. Rapid7 InsightIDR

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, ReversingLabs, Group-IB and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Updated: October 2021.
543,089 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

"The feature that I like best is the dashboard.""The most valuable feature is alerting.""It integrates well with other solutions and provides good threat intelligence in terms of external threats."

More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Pros »

"The web interface is great — very useful and user-friendly.""If you were on other solutions, you would notice that they use agents from third-party, from open-source, from a native OS, or from other tools. Here, however, it is an agent from Rapid7 itself. This adds to the solution's overall capabilities.""It is a very stable solution.""Very intuitive and easy to set up.""Simple configuration and automatically syncs to the cloud platform.""Rapid7 InsightIDR integrates well with other solutions. It's also easy to configure because Rapid7 InsightIDR has a lot of instructions posted on their website that customers can follow if they need to get the source log."

More Rapid7 InsightIDR Pros »

"I would like to have more technical documentation that contains greater detail on the types of threats that are occurring.""It would be better if they used the threat intelligence feeds directly from their side and changing the verdict instead of us requesting it.""It is a completely cloud-based product at present."

More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Cons »

"The interface for doing investigation needs to be enhanced with minor improvements that would make it more useful.""Cloud risk assessment is one area where I think they need a lot of improvement.""The dashboard is an area that could be simplified.""Lacks a mobile application.""Inability to get access to compliance reports within the solution.""InsightIDR is only available in a cloud version. Some of our customers prefer an on-prem solution because they want to manage the security within their environment."

More Rapid7 InsightIDR Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"It is a reasonably priced solution."

More Rapid7 InsightIDR Pricing and Cost Advice »

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
543,089 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is alerting.
Top Answer: At times in AutoFocus, when you have a homegrown application or you check another threat intelligence feed, it's not malicious but is still categorized as gray. We need to request a change in the… more »
Top Answer: We are using AutoFocus with my playbooks. We use it on a daily basis. We receive alerts on the Playbook. We receive alerts for threat intelligence, malware alerts, and virus alerts. We use Autofocus… more »
Top Answer: Simple configuration and automatically syncs to the cloud platform.
Top Answer: Licensing costs are based on a subscription model. The solution is very cost-effective because they are not charging based on the EPS but on the number of assets.
Top Answer: I'd like to be able to get the compliance report within the solution which is currently not possible. For example, the P-Series was around 77001 compliance report of your SIEM solution. That option is… more »
Average Words per Review
Average Words per Review
Also Known As
Learn More

AutoFocus contextual threat intelligence service accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Unique, targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.

Parsing hundreds of trivial alerts. Managing a mountain of data. Manually forwarding info from your endpoints. Forget that. InsightIDR instantly arms you with the insight you need to make better decisions across the incident detection and response lifecycle, faster.

Learn more about Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Learn more about Rapid7 InsightIDR
Sample Customers
Telkom Indonesia
Liberty Wines, Pioneer Telephone, Visier
Top Industries
Comms Service Provider21%
Computer Software Company19%
Insurance Company8%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider21%
Financial Services Firm5%
Company Size
No Data Available
Small Business42%
Midsize Enterprise42%
Large Enterprise17%
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, ReversingLabs, Group-IB and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Updated: October 2021.
543,089 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is ranked 12th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 3 reviews while Rapid7 InsightIDR is ranked 10th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 6 reviews. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is rated 8.0, while Rapid7 InsightIDR is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus writes "Identifies critical attacks, easy to use, stable, and integrates well ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightIDR writes "Easy to use with a simple setup and good scalability". Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is most compared with Cisco Threat Grid, LogRhythm NextGen SIEM, Trend Micro Deep Discovery, Recorded Future and ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP), whereas Rapid7 InsightIDR is most compared with Darktrace, Splunk, Azure Sentinel, IBM QRadar and AT&T AlienVault USM.

We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.