Compare Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus vs. Tenable.ep

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, ReversingLabs, Group-IB and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Updated: September 2021.
533,638 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The feature that I like best is the dashboard.""The most valuable feature is alerting.""It integrates well with other solutions and provides good threat intelligence in terms of external threats."

More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Pros »

"The solution is very easy to set up."

More Tenable.ep Pros »

Cons
"I would like to have more technical documentation that contains greater detail on the types of threats that are occurring.""It would be better if they used the threat intelligence feeds directly from their side and changing the verdict instead of us requesting it.""It is a completely cloud-based product at present."

More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Cons »

"The product has limited reporting capabilities and it isn't great at allowing for customization in reports."

More Tenable.ep Cons »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
533,638 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is alerting.
Top Answer: At times in AutoFocus, when you have a homegrown application or you check another threat intelligence feed, it's not malicious but is still categorized as gray. We need to request a change in the… more »
Top Answer: We are using AutoFocus with my playbooks. We use it on a daily basis. We receive alerts on the Playbook. We receive alerts for threat intelligence, malware alerts, and virus alerts. We use Autofocus… more »
Top Answer: The solution is very easy to set up.
Top Answer: We find the pricing to be reasonable. It's not too expensive.
Top Answer: The product has limited reporting capabilities and it isn't great at allowing for customization in reports. It's one of the downsides. We get a lot of feedback from customers expressing their concerns… more »
Ranking
Views
1,122
Comparisons
761
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
370
Rating
8.0
Views
79
Comparisons
46
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
485
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

AutoFocus contextual threat intelligence service accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Unique, targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.

See Everything. Predict What Matters.
Understand your risk and know which vulnerabilities to fix first with Tenable.io
Get a risk-based view of your entire attack surface—from IT to cloud to containers—so you can quickly identify, investigate and prioritize vulnerabilities.

Managed in the cloud and powered by Nessus technology, Tenable.io provides the industry's most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with the ability to predict which security issues to remediate first. It’s your complete end-to-end vulnerability management solution.

Offer
Learn more about Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Learn more about Tenable.ep
Sample Customers
Telkom Indonesia
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider22%
Computer Software Company19%
Insurance Company8%
Media Company7%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, ReversingLabs, Group-IB and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Updated: September 2021.
533,638 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is ranked 12th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 3 reviews while Tenable.ep is ranked 34th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 1 review. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is rated 8.0, while Tenable.ep is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus writes "Identifies critical attacks, easy to use, stable, and integrates well ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable.ep writes "Good pricing, responsive technical support, and great for risk management". Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is most compared with Cisco Threat Grid, LogRhythm NextGen SIEM, Trend Micro Deep Discovery, Recorded Future and ThreatStream, whereas Tenable.ep is most compared with Pentera.

See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.