Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus vs Tenable One Exposure Management Platform comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus and Tenable One Exposure Management Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, Check Point Software Technologies, Microsoft and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms.
To learn more, read our detailed Threat Intelligence Platforms Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It integrates well with other solutions and provides good threat intelligence in terms of external threats.""The feature that I like best is the dashboard.""The logs play a crucial role as they contribute to blocking unwanted Internet traffic.""The most valuable feature is alerting.""I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security."

More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Pros →

"The product gives us a lot of insight.""The solution is very easy to set up."

More Tenable One Exposure Management Platform Pros →

Cons
"It would be better if they used the threat intelligence feeds directly from their side and changing the verdict instead of us requesting it.""I would like the tool to see more integration with Cortex XDR. There is no real reason to keep them separate.""I would like to have more technical documentation that contains greater detail on the types of threats that are occurring.""It is a completely cloud-based product at present.""It would be helpful to have better documentation for configuring and installing the solution."

More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Cons →

"The product has limited reporting capabilities and it isn't great at allowing for customization in reports.""It would be nice if the product provided an agent for enforcing policies."

More Tenable One Exposure Management Platform Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security.
Top Answer:I would like the tool to see more integration with Cortex XDR. There is no real reason to keep them separate.
Top Answer:The tool along with other suite of products provides us with threat and alert information.
Top Answer:The product gives us a lot of insight.
Top Answer:Access management must be improved. The access manager, security tool, and access control need very big improvements. It would be nice if the product provided an agent for enforcing policies. For now… more »
Ranking
Views
1,160
Comparisons
396
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
354
Rating
7.5
Views
189
Comparisons
134
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
357
Rating
10.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Tenable.ep
Learn More
Overview

AutoFocus contextual threat intelligence service accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Unique, targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.

You can now translate technical asset, vulnerability and threat data into clear business insights and actionable intelligence for security executives. Combine broad exposure coverage spanning IT assets, cloud resources, containers, web apps and identity platforms, with threat intelligence and data science from Tenable Research. Focus efforts to prevent likely attacks and accurately communicate cyber risk to support optimal business performance.

Tenable One is an exposure management platform that combines risk-based vulnerability management, web application security, cloud security and identity security.
Sample Customers
Telkom Indonesia
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm16%
Computer Software Company11%
Manufacturing Company10%
Government9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company18%
Financial Services Firm9%
Manufacturing Company9%
University7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise57%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise68%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise61%
Buyer's Guide
Threat Intelligence Platforms
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, Check Point Software Technologies, Microsoft and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is ranked 9th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 5 reviews while Tenable One Exposure Management Platform is ranked 15th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 2 reviews. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is rated 7.8, while Tenable One Exposure Management Platform is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus writes "Impressive performance and monitoring capabilities but lacks in documentation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable One Exposure Management Platform writes "A highly scalable and reasonably priced solution that provides insight into user activities". Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is most compared with ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP), Anomali ThreatStream, VirusTotal, LogRhythm SIEM and Cisco Threat Grid, whereas Tenable One Exposure Management Platform is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Pentera, Picus Security and AttackIQ.

See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.