Compare Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus vs. ThreatQ

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Recorded Future, Group-IB and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Updated: May 2021.
510,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The feature that I like best is the dashboard.""The most valuable feature is alerting.""It integrates well with other solutions and provides good threat intelligence in terms of external threats."

More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Pros »

"The reporting services are great. With reporting services, if you have customers that just visit a URL you can see the result - including why it's blocked and how and how the URL was first recognized as malicious."

More ThreatQ Pros »

Cons
"I would like to have more technical documentation that contains greater detail on the types of threats that are occurring.""It would be better if they used the threat intelligence feeds directly from their side and changing the verdict instead of us requesting it.""It is a completely cloud-based product at present."

More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Cons »

"The solution should be simpler for the end-user in terms of reporting and navigating the product."

More ThreatQ Cons »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
510,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is alerting.
Top Answer: At times in AutoFocus, when you have a homegrown application or you check another threat intelligence feed, it's not malicious but is still categorized as gray. We need to request a change in the… more »
Top Answer: We are using AutoFocus with my playbooks. We use it on a daily basis. We receive alerts on the Playbook. We receive alerts for threat intelligence, malware alerts, and virus alerts. We use Autofocus… more »
Top Answer: The reporting services are great. With reporting services, if you have customers that just visit a URL you can see the result - including why it's blocked and how and how the URL was first recognized… more »
Top Answer: I'm not sure if the solution is currently missing any features. I haven't noticed anything that could be added. The biggest challenge is the deployment. The installation of the ThreatQ only takes the… more »
Top Answer: Initially, the solution was assigned to just extract the reports we needed. We just integrated our threat feed URLs to the ThreatQ platform. We could create a report which was like a categorized… more »
Ranking
Views
1,104
Comparisons
749
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
385
Rating
8.0
Views
1,337
Comparisons
956
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
767
Rating
7.0
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

AutoFocus contextual threat intelligence service accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Unique, targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.

ThreatQ is a Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) designed to enable threat operations and management. ThreatQ is the only solution with an integrated Threat Library, Adaptive Workbench and Open Exchange that help you to act upon the most relevant threats facing your organization and to get more out of your existing security infrastructure.

Offer
Learn more about Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Learn more about ThreatQ
Sample Customers
Telkom Indonesia
Radar, Bitdefender, Crowdstrike, FireEye, IBM Security
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider21%
Computer Software Company18%
Insurance Company9%
Media Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm9%
Manufacturing Company7%
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Recorded Future, Group-IB and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Updated: May 2021.
510,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is ranked 12th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 3 reviews while ThreatQ is ranked 13th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 1 review. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is rated 8.0, while ThreatQ is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus writes "Identifies critical attacks, easy to use, stable, and integrates well ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatQ writes "Good reporting and pretty stable but needs to be simpler to use". Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is most compared with LogRhythm NextGen SIEM, Cisco Threat Grid, Trend Micro Deep Discovery, ThreatStream and Recorded Future, whereas ThreatQ is most compared with ThreatConnect, Recorded Future, IntSights, ReversingLabs Titanium Platform and EclecticIQ.

See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.