Compare Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus vs. ThreatStream

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Recorded Future, Group-IB and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Updated: May 2021.
510,534 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
510,534 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is alerting.
Top Answer: At times in AutoFocus, when you have a homegrown application or you check another threat intelligence feed, it's not malicious but is still categorized as gray. We need to request a change in the… more »
Top Answer: We are using AutoFocus with my playbooks. We use it on a daily basis. We receive alerts on the Playbook. We receive alerts for threat intelligence, malware alerts, and virus alerts. We use Autofocus… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
1,104
Comparisons
749
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
385
Rating
8.0
Views
984
Comparisons
748
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
ThreatStream OPTIC
Learn More
Overview

AutoFocus contextual threat intelligence service accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Unique, targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.

ThreatStream Optic provides the essential analysis and correlation that you need to translate raw, unstructured and duplicative data into true intelligence. Reduce the noise of false positives, outdated and irrelevant data in minutes, and what’s left is true insight... in the form of pre-built rules, reports, and dashboards that you can immediately apply and manage within your SIEM console.

Offer
Learn more about Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Learn more about ThreatStream
Sample Customers
Telkom Indonesia
BBCN Bank
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider21%
Computer Software Company19%
Insurance Company9%
Media Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider21%
Financial Services Firm11%
Government8%
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Recorded Future, Group-IB and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Updated: May 2021.
510,534 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is ranked 12th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 3 reviews while ThreatStream is ranked 15th in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is rated 8.0, while ThreatStream is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus writes "Identifies critical attacks, easy to use, stable, and integrates well ". On the other hand, Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is most compared with LogRhythm NextGen SIEM, Cisco Threat Grid, Trend Micro Deep Discovery, Recorded Future and Rapid7 InsightIDR, whereas ThreatStream is most compared with Recorded Future, ThreatConnect, IBM X-Force and ThreatQ.

See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.