Compare Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus vs. Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Recorded Future, Group-IB and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Updated: May 2021.
511,521 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The feature that I like best is the dashboard.""The most valuable feature is alerting.""It integrates well with other solutions and provides good threat intelligence in terms of external threats."

More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Pros »

"The most valuable feature is the central command center, where we can control and manage the solution.""The IPS signatures and the IPS database that are given are much better than what is commonly available.""The technical support on offer is very good.""It integrates easily."

More Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System Pros »

Cons
"I would like to have more technical documentation that contains greater detail on the types of threats that are occurring.""It would be better if they used the threat intelligence feeds directly from their side and changing the verdict instead of us requesting it.""It is a completely cloud-based product at present."

More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Cons »

"I would like to see this solution more lightweight and easier to install.""We need more integration. It would be good if Azure IPS and TippingPoint IPS and other products from Trend Micro like their DBI and IWSVA could talk between each other.""The solution is pretty expensive.""It integrates well but it takes time."

More Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
511,521 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is alerting.
Top Answer: At times in AutoFocus, when you have a homegrown application or you check another threat intelligence feed, it's not malicious but is still categorized as gray. We need to request a change in the… more »
Top Answer: We are using AutoFocus with my playbooks. We use it on a daily basis. We receive alerts on the Playbook. We receive alerts for threat intelligence, malware alerts, and virus alerts. We use Autofocus… more »
Top Answer: It's an expensive product. The price could be reduced. Customers need to pay for a license along with the appliance. Licensing is on a yearly basis.
Top Answer: It integrates well but it takes time. The integration process should be faster.
Ranking
Views
1,104
Comparisons
749
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
385
Rating
8.0
Views
3,346
Comparisons
2,528
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
685
Rating
7.8
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
TippingPoint Digital Vaccine, TippingPoint DV, Trend Micro Digital Vaccine, Trend Micro DV, Trend Micro TippingPoint NGIPS
Learn More
Overview

AutoFocus contextual threat intelligence service accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Unique, targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.

Keep ahead of the latest threats and protect your critical data with ongoing threat prevention and analysis.

Offer
Learn more about Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Learn more about Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System
Sample Customers
Telkom Indonesia
Yapi Kredi
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider21%
Computer Software Company19%
Insurance Company9%
Media Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider29%
Computer Software Company27%
Government7%
Financial Services Firm6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business64%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise18%
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Recorded Future, Group-IB and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Updated: May 2021.
511,521 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is ranked 12th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 3 reviews while Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System is ranked 8th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 4 reviews. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is rated 8.0, while Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus writes "Identifies critical attacks, easy to use, stable, and integrates well ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System writes "IPS signatures and the IPS database are much better than what is commonly available". Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is most compared with LogRhythm NextGen SIEM, Cisco Threat Grid, Trend Micro Deep Discovery, ThreatStream and Recorded Future, whereas Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System is most compared with Check Point IPS, Cisco NGIPS, Trend Micro Deep Discovery, McAfee Network Security Platform and Cisco Sourcefire SNORT.

See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.