Ram BalajiPre-sales Engineer at VFM Systems And Services
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The feature that I like best is the dashboard."
"The most valuable feature is alerting."
"It integrates well with other solutions and provides good threat intelligence in terms of external threats."
"The most valuable feature is the central command center, where we can control and manage the solution."
"The IPS signatures and the IPS database that are given are much better than what is commonly available."
"The technical support on offer is very good."
"It integrates easily."
"I would like to have more technical documentation that contains greater detail on the types of threats that are occurring."
"It would be better if they used the threat intelligence feeds directly from their side and changing the verdict instead of us requesting it."
"It is a completely cloud-based product at present."
"I would like to see this solution more lightweight and easier to install."
"We need more integration. It would be good if Azure IPS and TippingPoint IPS and other products from Trend Micro like their DBI and IWSVA could talk between each other."
"The solution is pretty expensive."
"It integrates well but it takes time."
"It's an expensive product."
AutoFocus contextual threat intelligence service accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Unique, targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.
Keep ahead of the latest threats and protect your critical data with ongoing threat prevention and analysis.
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is ranked 12th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 3 reviews while Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System is ranked 8th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 4 reviews. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is rated 8.0, while Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus writes "Identifies critical attacks, easy to use, stable, and integrates well ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System writes "IPS signatures and the IPS database are much better than what is commonly available". Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is most compared with LogRhythm NextGen SIEM, Cisco Threat Grid, Trend Micro Deep Discovery, ThreatStream and Recorded Future, whereas Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System is most compared with Check Point IPS, Cisco NGIPS, Trend Micro Deep Discovery, McAfee Network Security Platform and Cisco Sourcefire SNORT.
See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.