We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The most valuable features are simplicity and ease of integration."
"The automation part and the playbook creation part are awesome. The way it is responding to the customers and incidents is also very good. In the SOC environment, I guess it will carry out around 50% of the work."
"The pricing is very good."
"The automation is excellent."
"The most valuable features are the orchestration because of the way in which it coordinates the loss from all the devices and it provides us with a high-level overview of the critical log information."
"The reporting services are great. With reporting services, if you have customers that just visit a URL you can see the result - including why it's blocked and how and how the URL was first recognized as malicious."
"Implementing this solution requires a lot of involvement from the vendor and it should be made easier for the partners."
"For building automation, there is not a lot of good documentation. The documentation is there, but it is not very good from my perspective. There should be an improvement in this area. I don't see issues with anything else. In terms of new features, I have heard that other products have EBA functionality. It would be good if this functionality could be added."
"The user interface could be a bit better."
"When Palo Alto bought the solution, the pricing increased by 1.5 times. There's been a 50% increase, which is a lot."
"There should be an on-premise version available for customers to have different choices."
"The solution should be simpler for the end-user in terms of reporting and navigating the product."
"There is a perception that it is priced very high compared to other solutions."
"From the cost perspective, I have heard that its price is a bit high as compared to other similar products."
"There is a yearly license required for this solution and it is expensive."
Demisto Enterprise delivers a complete solution that helps Tier-1 through Tier-3 analysts and SOC managers to optimize the entire incident life cycle while auto documenting and journaling all the evidence. More than 100+ integrations enable security orchestration workflows for incident management and other critical security operation tasks.
ThreatQ is a Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) designed to enable threat operations and management. ThreatQ is the only solution with an integrated Threat Library, Adaptive Workbench and Open Exchange that help you to act upon the most relevant threats facing your organization and to get more out of your existing security infrastructure.
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is ranked 3rd in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 5 reviews while ThreatQ is ranked 11th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 1 review. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is rated 8.2, while ThreatQ is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR writes "User-friendly and robust with good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatQ writes "Good reporting and pretty stable but needs to be simpler to use". Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is most compared with Splunk Phantom, Fortinet FortiSOAR, IBM Resilient, ServiceNow Security Operations and Siemplify, whereas ThreatQ is most compared with ThreatConnect, Recorded Future, ReversingLabs Titanium Platform, IntSights and ThreatStream.
See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.
We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.