We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs. RedSeal

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about AlgoSec, Tufin, Palo Alto Networks and others in Firewall Security Management. Updated: November 2021.
554,529 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The ability to manage a large number of firewalls from a single point is most valuable.""Technical support is helpful and knowledgeable.""The compliance features are very effective at identifying things that need to be properly hardened.""Panorama is very easy, easy to administrate, and easy to control.""The installation process is very simple.""The product can scale.""The most valuable aspect of this solution is the ability to manage our devices centrally. Additionally, we can monitor the workforce connections, receive reports, and use the backup feature.""The reporting is great."

More Palo Alto Networks Panorama Pros »

"RedSeal integrates the network and gives us a visual or graphical overview of our network. If an organization is geographically dispersed, for instance, with one office in Canada and one office in the Philippines, the whole network, including all devices, is integrated into RedSeal, and you can see from where the traffic is going in and out.""This is the only solution in the world that gives you a digital resilience score.""The most valuable features are network mapping and configuration."

More RedSeal Pros »

Cons
"There could be more integrations with third parties.""The solution is extremely expensive. You can integrate it with other Palo Alto products, however, it ends up being too much.""The configuration could be a bit better.""It could be easier to manage. In the future, it should be much easier because it's not very easy to manage. So in the next release, I think it should be much easier to manage, especially in the first configuration. It could also be more stable.""There were a few bugs a couple of years into it. There was a big bug where it had trouble communicating with the two main boxes.""We found a vulnerability where when we have a low flow, like 2.7K, it is not getting fired by the threat prevention. That's something important to improve on. They should have a proxy or some solution to solve the issue. We also found some issues around decrypting the flow. When we have more flow than expected to decrypt, the performance goes down.""The initial setup can be complex.""The notification and alerting system could be improved."

More Palo Alto Networks Panorama Cons »

"One of the areas of concern is the GUI. It is important to our customers that the GUI looks beautiful. It's a Java Client, so you have a Java dependency.""Sometimes, it required us to refresh the configuration. When we integrated any of the configurations into the device, sometimes, it could not detect the exact picture of that device. So, we had to reset the device to see that if it was giving true-positive results or false-positive results. In some cases, we were not able to get true-positive results. There was some kind of bug in that version. Its interface is not user-friendly and needs to be improved. It takes time to understand the interface and various options. Skybox has quite a user-friendly interface. They could provide a feature for compliance audit policy if it is already not there. A compliance audit policy ensures that all configurations are based on the best practices standards, such as CIS benchmarks standard or other similar standards. It provides visibility about whether your device configuration is based on best practices or not. Usually, such a feature is provided by other solutions such as Meteor or Tenable Nessus.""The dashboard should be improved to make correlating data easier to do."

More RedSeal Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Its cost is quite high.""Licensing fees are paid yearly.""You can buy the hardware only and each box is not even $10,000. It's only $8,000 for the unit itself. However, then you are charged a three-year license at $81,000.""The solution is priced well and there is a license for this solution that we pay annually for.""The price of the licenses could be lower. Still, because we have Panorama with 25 firewalls, Palo Alto gives us a good discount.""We pay approximately $3,000 a year in order to use the product.""The pricing could be lower.""It is pretty reasonable as compared to other companies."

More Palo Alto Networks Panorama Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The pricing is based on the number of endpoints and devices, and we have seen it range from mid-five figures to low six figures."

More RedSeal Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewall Security Management solutions are best for your needs.
554,529 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable features of this solution are that it works better than a normal firewall, easy to explorer all of its features, and it has the Log Collector mode. This mode allows us to store our… more »
Top Answer: The solution is priced well and there is a license for this solution that we pay annually for.
Top Answer: There is a need to improve the upgrade process. When we are upgrading the solution we are facing some issues with Elasticsearch services. Every time we upgrade it takes a long time to become stable… more »
Top Answer: RedSeal integrates the network and gives us a visual or graphical overview of our network. If an organization is geographically dispersed, for instance, with one office in Canada and one office in the… more »
Top Answer: Sometimes, it required us to refresh the configuration. When we integrated any of the configurations into the device, sometimes, it could not detect the exact picture of that device. So, we had to… more »
Top Answer: We had a distributing environment, and we used RedSeal to look into the gaps in existing network connectivities. We looked into if any of the forbidden accesses are open. We also looked at the points… more »
Ranking
Views
4,405
Comparisons
2,617
Reviews
29
Average Words per Review
444
Rating
8.6
3rd
out of 6 in Network Modeling
Views
2,054
Comparisons
1,397
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
984
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Panorama network security management provides static rules and dynamic security updates in an ever-changing threat landscape. Reduce administrator workload and improve your overall security posture with a single rule base for firewall, threat prevention, URL filtering, application awareness, user identification, file blocking and data filtering.

RedSeal’s network modeling and risk scoring platform builds an accurate, up-to-date model of an organization’s entire, as-built network to visualize access paths, prioritize what to fix, so you can target existing cybersecurity resources to protect your most valuable assets. With RedSeal’s Digital Resilience Score, decision makers can see the security status and benchmark progress toward digital resilience.

Offer
Learn more about Palo Alto Networks Panorama
Learn more about RedSeal
Sample Customers
University of Arkansas, JBG SMITH, Temple University, Telkom Indonesia
United States Postal Service, Pacific Gas and Electric Co., Interval International
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm19%
Computer Software Company15%
Manufacturing Company12%
Media Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Comms Service Provider20%
Media Company8%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company23%
Comms Service Provider19%
Government15%
Financial Services Firm9%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business32%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise48%
REVIEWERS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise75%
Find out what your peers are saying about AlgoSec, Tufin, Palo Alto Networks and others in Firewall Security Management. Updated: November 2021.
554,529 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Palo Alto Networks Panorama is ranked 3rd in Firewall Security Management with 34 reviews while RedSeal is ranked 3rd in Network Modeling with 3 reviews. Palo Alto Networks Panorama is rated 8.6, while RedSeal is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Panorama writes "Easy to manage with a straightforward initial setup and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RedSeal writes "Improves visibility, helps determine risk and compliance, and reliably enhances security". Palo Alto Networks Panorama is most compared with AWS Firewall Manager, Fortinet FortiGate Cloud, AlgoSec, Tufin and Fortinet FortiPortal, whereas RedSeal is most compared with AlgoSec, Skybox Security Suite, FireMon, Tufin and Cisco Stealthwatch.

We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.