Compare Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs. Tufin

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Tufin Logo
Read 13 Tufin reviews.
20,386 views|11,906 comparisons
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs. Tufin and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
534,057 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

"The solution is very stable. It's reliable. We don't experience bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash. It works as expected.""The product features allow the capacity to take effective, advanced security measures.""Centralized management is a valuable feature.""Our team has the option to make configuration changes at any given time.""Palo Alto technical support is excellent.""The compliance features are very effective at identifying things that need to be properly hardened.""Networks Panorama has improved our organizational security""You don't need an overly experienced workforce to handle Palo Alto. It's very easy to use."

More Palo Alto Networks Panorama Pros »

"The most valuable feature is alerting, which lets me know when someone has made a change.""There are a lot of benefits to using the reporting. It gives us duplicate objects, duplicate services, shadow firewall rules, and the firewall rules not needed for a given number of days or months.""It allows administrators to visualize the traffic flow, and troubleshoot when necessary.""You can easily scale the solution if you need to.""The solution is quite scalable.""The technical support is pretty good.""It provides very good reports. It can easily integrate with multiple firewalls, such as Cisco, Juniper, Palo Alto, and Checkpoint. We can push a policy from Tufin to a firewall, which is a very good feature. We can monitor all access rules and the operating system of a firewall.""The reporting on offer is very good. Tufin makes nice reports."

More Tufin Pros »

"The solution should improve the speed at which they make changes on the system. Historically, they've been a bit slow in that respect. They should apply changes to the box quicker and more often.""The product could use some method of allowing for more customization and open integration with other controls.""Lacking in speed and reliability.""At times we have noticed that we get into issues where Panorama is going too slow or has other little problems. The performance can suffer occasionally.""This would be a better solution if it were more tightly integrated with the firewalls.""They need to do less bug-related releases and create versions that are stable for at least six months at a time. I don't find this issue in other solutions like Cisco, Check Point, FortiGate, or others. Those just provide a patch if there is a bug and we don't have to worry about downtime.""I would like to have better analytics.""It should have more connection with Threat Intelligence Cloud. They can also include features related to SecOps and automation API."

More Palo Alto Networks Panorama Cons »

"I would like to see visibility into the FW features like IPS/Content Filter policies, the same way it does for FW rules/policies.""There are pros and cons to the workflow. You cannot customize it fully and there are some limitations. You cannot create a pure object, a firewall, IP, or service (single layer) object. You can only create a firewall object group. That is one of the challenges.""They need to offer more support to vendors, such as Cisco, Checkpoint, Fortinet, and Forcepoint.""The initial setup can be tough.""The older version that we have doesn't support some newer firewall vendors.""The pricing of the solution is rather expensive.""Currently, we are able to monitor access rules and the operating system of a firewall. It would be great if we can also monitor the configuration of the firewall through Tufin.""The pricing could be a bit more competitive."

More Tufin Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"We pay approximately $3,000 a year in order to use the product.""The pricing model is reasonable for this class of solutions.""Palo Alto is expensive and there are many cheaper firewalls, but they do not work as well.""It is not a cheap solution.""The price of Panorama is expensive.""The solution is priced well and there is a license for this solution that we pay annually for.""We have a yearly license. The cost is not that high and not that cheap either.""Sometimes the company prefers to give a license to test the product in our environment before we go to the customer. But the customer should buy his own license, and that's the system here. The system is different between one country and another. Some countries say that the IT solutions provider should provide the license."

More Palo Alto Networks Panorama Pricing and Cost Advice »

"I believe our cost is more than $100,000 per year.""It's quite an expensive solution.""Price could always be better, but there are always consequences.""The price is on the cheaper side.""Its price is reasonable, but it could be lower. It has been cost-effective for us. We have a contract for three years.""Because we're quite a large company, the price wasn't too much of a factor for us."

More Tufin Pricing and Cost Advice »

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewall Security Management solutions are best for your needs.
534,057 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable features of this solution are that it works better than a normal firewall, easy to explorer all of its features, and it has the Log Collector mode. This mode allows us to store our… more »
Top Answer: The solution is priced well and there is a license for this solution that we pay annually for.
Top Answer: There is a need to improve the upgrade process. When we are upgrading the solution we are facing some issues with Elasticsearch services. Every time we upgrade it takes a long time to become stable… more »
Top Answer: All the basic functions work well.
Top Answer: As an architect, the pricing seems expensive to me. For what it does, I would say it's expensive.
Top Answer: Our compliance goes through SecureChange and they give us the rule set and then the recommendation. Ideally we'd like to press a button and create a Terraform to put into the build and deploy. We… more »
Average Words per Review
Average Words per Review
Learn More

Panorama network security management provides static rules and dynamic security updates in an ever-changing threat landscape. Reduce administrator workload and improve your overall security posture with a single rule base for firewall, threat prevention, URL filtering, application awareness, user identification, file blocking and data filtering.

Tufin enables organizations to automate their security policy visibility, risk management, provisioning and compliance across their multi-vendor, hybrid environment. Customers gain visibility and control across their network, ensure continuous compliance with security standards and embed security enforcement into workflows and development pipelines. 

Learn more about Palo Alto Networks Panorama
Learn more about Tufin
Sample Customers
University of Arkansas, JBG SMITH, Temple University, Telkom Indonesia
3M, AT&T, Blue Cross Blue Shield, BNP Parabas, ConocoPhillips, Deutsche Bank, GE, IBM, Pfizer, United States Postal Service 
Top Industries
Financial Services Firm20%
Computer Software Company16%
Manufacturing Company12%
Comms Service Provider8%
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider16%
Media Company9%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Financial Services Firm27%
Comms Service Provider9%
Healthcare Company7%
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm10%
Company Size
Small Business31%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise48%
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise6%
Large Enterprise81%
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise39%
Large Enterprise41%
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs. Tufin and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
534,057 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Palo Alto Networks Panorama is ranked 3rd in Firewall Security Management with 32 reviews while Tufin is ranked 2nd in Firewall Security Management with 13 reviews. Palo Alto Networks Panorama is rated 8.6, while Tufin is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Panorama writes "Easy to manage with a straightforward initial setup and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tufin writes "Provides great visibility, allows us to automate the entire change process, and saves A LOT of time". Palo Alto Networks Panorama is most compared with AWS Firewall Manager, AlgoSec, Fortinet FortiGate Cloud, FireMon and Skybox Security Suite, whereas Tufin is most compared with AlgoSec, FireMon, Skybox Security Suite, ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer and Cisco Defense Orchestrator. See our Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs. Tufin report.

See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.

We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.