We performed a comparison between Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention and Splunk User Behavior Analytics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The stability of Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is good."
"I like the solution's interface."
"The most valuable features are that it's user-friendly, has interesting features, URL filtering, and threat prevention."
"You can scale the product."
"Most of the features of Palo Alto Threat Prevention are alright. I recommend features like content filtering, IP address, & intelligent firewalls. The reporting feature is very good."
"The sandboxing tools offer great prevention for cloud feeds."
"One of the most valuable features is the anti-malware protection."
"The user interface is a bit more professional than some free products."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to search through a large amount of data."
"This is a good security product."
"The solution is definitely scalable."
"The product is at the forefront of auto-remediation networking. It's great."
"The solution is extremely scalable. Our customers are regularly scaling up after installing Splunk."
"Because of some of the visualizations that we utilize, we are able to understand strange, unusual traffic on our networks."
"This intelligent user behavior analytics package is easy to configure and use while remaining feature filled."
"It is a solution that helps test and measure customer satisfaction."
"The organization mail security solutions could be improved. There is no mail security solution available."
"The initial setup is complex."
"The cost involves the price of the hardware, which is expensive. However, most of the Palo Alto solutions are expensive."
"Generally, to deploy it will take some downtime, about a day."
"The documentation needs to be improved. I need better information about how to configure it and what the best practices are."
"Right now we are focusing on email. If Palo Alto can increase the features related to email filtering and the new malware, it would help us protect our systems."
"The technology firewall anomaly network could stand improvement."
"I think they can use some improvement on FID."
"I would like improved downward integration with other tools such as McAfee and other GCP solutions."
"In the future I would like to see simplified statistics and analytical threats."
"The price of Splunk UBA is too high."
"We'd like the ability to do custom searches."
"They should work to add more built-in correlation searches and more use cases based on worldwide customer experiences. They need more ready-made use cases."
"There are occasional bugs."
"The ability to do more complicated data investigation would be a welcome addition for pros, though the functionality now gives most people what they need."
"The solution is much more expensive than relative competitors like ArcSight or LogRhythm. It makes it hard to sell to customers sometimes."
More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Splunk User Behavior Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is ranked 6th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 24 reviews while Splunk User Behavior Analytics is ranked 12th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 17 reviews. Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is rated 8.8, while Splunk User Behavior Analytics is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention writes "A good amount of granularity and advanced URL filtering capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk User Behavior Analytics writes "Easy to configure and easy to use solution that integrates with many applications and scripts ". Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is most compared with Check Point IPS, Fortinet FortiGate IPS, Arista NDR, Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall and Rapid7 InsightIDR, whereas Splunk User Behavior Analytics is most compared with Darktrace, Microsoft Defender for Identity, IBM Security QRadar, Varonis Datalert and Weka. See our Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs. Splunk User Behavior Analytics report.
See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.
We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.