Palo Alto Networks VM-Series vs Sophos Cyberoam UTM

Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is ranked 21st in Firewalls with 4 reviews vs Sophos Cyberoam UTM which is ranked 5th in Firewalls with 13 reviews. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks VM-Series writes "A reliable tool with excellent support". The top reviewer of Sophos Cyberoam UTM writes "I like the remote VOIP routing through the VPN". Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Meraki MX Firewalls and Juniper SRX. Sophos Cyberoam UTM is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Sophos UTM and SonicWall TZ. See our Palo Alto Networks VM-Series vs Sophos Cyberoam UTM report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks VM-Series vs Sophos Cyberoam UTM and others in Firewalls.
279,075 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Palo Alto Networks VM-Series vs Sophos Cyberoam UTM

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
It is reliable and the support is very good.In the newer version, there are 3850s, all of them are scalable. They fit better into the medium or small businesses.They now know the details about their network traffic that they did not know before: Applications that they are using and some application they did not know they were using.A solid operating system with all the necessary data center security features.We have reduced the number of configuration lines by 90%. We need fewer number of admins right now because of it.It scales linearly with load and no issues.We now know a lot more detail about what our users are doing on the network.It is very stable. It is fairly easy to use.

Read more »

The best feature is the flexibility the product offers, in terms of remote access. What we had before was a decentralized mechanism in our organization, but after having this product we were able to get the remote locations into the same LAN. We were able to control the bandwidth and were able to take virtual access of those machines and give them the support, as and when required.Bandwidth Management and aggregation. It is valuable for combining two ISPs. Switching to a secondary/redundant ISP is thus seamless, in the event that the primary ISP goes down. The Bandwidth Management is also valuable for limiting heavy downloaders that may impact negatively on the experience of other users.The product has helped control bandwidth utilization, as well as enhanced connectivity and security to remote locations.User and network policies to be managed on a single screen with powerful filtering and search options.Good user interface.Web Filtering and Application Filtering saves a lot of my bandwidth and improves the user's productivity.Web application filtering eases internet access control.Content filtering, as this enables me to control that which employees can view at different time quotas.

Read more »

Cons
From time to time, they have released some content updates that have some issues, maybe twice a year.There are various reports that come with the box or with the VMware, but you can only run them daily.All areas need improvement: manufacturing, education, financial, etc.The user-friendliness of the UI could be improved.The interface is all Java-based. I would prefer an HTML5 interface.Just sometimes it can be a bit sluggish navigating through pages. That is just purely because of Java.​

Read more »

I have problems with the email filtering. Emails pass through without any filtering affecting them. When I get back to them and tell them this is the issue, they check everything and say it is not in their database signature and they have to update it. But you know, by that time, my user has already opened it.There is a lot or room for improvement, because it is still not a fourth or fifth generation firewall. It lacks security features.Needs a mail alert/notification when the device loses any of its connections, during ISP redundancy implementation.The following could be improved: Web Filtering using wildcards; clarity regarding the firewall rules; granular reporting features.On-box sandstorm should be available. As of now, it is from their cloud.We use different workarounds and find different solutions for it, depending on the client's needs. We shouldn't have to, we should just be able to use the product as it comes with Cyberoam, rather than having to revert to other products.The Traffic Discovery feature should allow administrators to disconnect unnecessary live connections.VPN configuration is not very swift.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
I know Palo Alto is not cheap. They have been telling me, the members of the finance team, it is not a cheap solution. It is a solution whose target is that no matter how big your organization is, small, medium, or large, it is about the maturity of your security team or infrastructure team whom you want to work with.It is a little bit of crazy if you compare it to Vanguard, Sophos, or even Cisco. The newest version of Cisco, the Next-Generation Firewall of Cisco, is less expensive than Palo Alto. It is more comparable to Check Point.For licensing, It depends how they want to use the firewall. The firewall can be used only for IPS purposes. If you only want that firewall IPSs, you will only need a license that is called threat prevention. That license, threat prevention, includes vulnerabilities, antivirus signatures and one additional measure (that I can't remember), but it includes three measures and security updates.The box, if you do not want to buy the threat prevention license in the box, you can buy it only with the support license. It is for the support of the hardware. It works like a simple firewall. It integrates what it calls user IDs and application IDs. If you do not buy any other license, only the firewall, Palo Alto will also help you improve a lot of your security.​The licensing is pretty much like everyone else.When you have a client compare box against box, a lot of times Palo Alto is a bit more expensive, but its network firewalls have a very rich ratio.Do not buy larges box if you do not need them. Rightsizing is a great task to do before​hand.For what you get, it does do what it says. It is a good value for an enterprise firewall.​

Read more »

It is worth the value.It’s value for the money. It’s functionally competitive with higher priced alternative brands.The price is very competitive and the licensing is easy.It is more expensive than cheap routers, but it offers a lot of functionality, and that warrants the price.Licensing is a bit costly, mostly for features requiring subscription.It is very reasonably priced as compared to other solutions in the market.Licensing is very good value for the money.

Read more »

Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks VM-Series vs Sophos Cyberoam UTM and others in Firewalls.
279,075 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
808
Comparisons
443
Reviews
3
Followers
82
Avg. Rating
9.0
Views
26,786
Comparisons
19,978
Reviews
12
Followers
1,783
Avg. Rating
8.3
Top Comparisons
Top ComparisonsSee more Palo Alto Networks VM-Series competitors »
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
See more Sophos Cyberoam UTM competitors »
Website/Video
Website/VideoPalo Alto Networks
Sophos
Overview
Overview

The VM-Series is a virtualized form factor of our next-generation firewall that can be deployed in a range of private and public cloud computing environments based on technologies from VMware, Amazon Web Services, Microsoft, Citrix and KVM.

The VM-Series natively analyzes all traffic in a single pass to determine the application identity, the content within, and the user identity. These core elements of your business can then be used as integral components of your security policy, enabling you to improve your security efficacy through a positive control model and reduce your incident response time though complete visibility into applications across all ports.

In both private and public cloud environments, the VM-Series can be deployed as a perimeter gateway, an IPsec VPN termination point, and a segmentation gateway, protecting your workloads with application enablement and threat prevention policies.

Cyberoam Unified Threat Management hardware appliances offer comprehensive security to organizations, ranging from large enterprises to small and branch offices. Multiple security features integrated over a single, Layer 8 Identity-based platform make security simple, yet highly effective.
OFFER
Learn more about Palo Alto Networks VM-Series
Learn more about Sophos Cyberoam UTM
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersWarren Rogers AssociatesGulf Corporation for Technology, Maridive & Oil Services, Fidelity Bank, Petra University, Capital FM Kenya, Safari Park Hotel and Casino, Mayfair Casino, Pacific International Lines, Mozambique Ministry of Education, University of Namibia, Royal Hospital for Neuro-disability, University of Hawai, New Delhi Municipal Council
Top Industries
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Manufacturing Company
10%
Integrator
10%
Transportation Company
10%
Government
10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
10%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Non Tech Company
8%
Transportation Company
7%
Company Size
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business
48%
Midsize Enterprise
30%
Large Enterprise
22%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
35%
Midsize Enterprise
37%
Large Enterprise
28%
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks VM-Series vs Sophos Cyberoam UTM and others in Firewalls.
Download now
279,075 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email