Compare Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs. STAXX

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft, RSA and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP). Updated: September 2021.
534,057 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The licensing fees are on an annual basis, and there are no costs in addition to the standard fees.""We pay between $3,000 and $4,000 CAD ($2,200 - $3,000 USD) per year to maintain this solution.""This solution is very pricey and it depends on the package that you implement.""I think they should lower the price of this solution""The pricing is highly expensive.""This is an expensive product and the market for Palo Alto in Poland could be much bigger if the pricing was comparable to Fortinet.""The price is a bit higher than the other products such as TrendMicro, or FireEye.""Pricing could be improved."

More Palo Alto Networks WildFire Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.
534,057 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ranking
Views
34,848
Comparisons
30,731
Reviews
13
Average Words per Review
467
Rating
8.6
Views
219
Comparisons
171
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview
WildFire™ cloud-based threat analysis service is the industry’s most advanced analysis and prevention engine for highly evasive zero-day exploits and malware. The cloud-based service employs a unique multi-technique approach combining dynamic and static analysis, innovative machine learning techniques, and a groundbreaking bare metal analysis environment to detect and prevent even the most evasive threats.

STAXX gives you an easy way to access any STIX/TAXII feed. Simply:

- Download the STAXX client

- Enable out-of-the-box intel feeds, or configure your own

- Set up a download schedule

Offer
Learn more about Palo Alto Networks WildFire
Learn more about STAXX
Sample Customers
Novamedia, Nexon Asia Pacific, Lenovo, Samsonite, IOOF, Sinogrid, SanDisk Corporation
Bank of England, First Energy, UBISOFT, Bank of Hope, Blackhawk Network
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider18%
Government18%
Media Company12%
Financial Services Firm12%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider26%
Computer Software Company22%
Government7%
Energy/Utilities Company4%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business47%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise39%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise72%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft, RSA and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP). Updated: September 2021.
534,057 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Palo Alto Networks WildFire is ranked 1st in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 17 reviews while STAXX is ranked 20th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP). Palo Alto Networks WildFire is rated 8.6, while STAXX is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks WildFire writes "Good technical support and provides automatic analysis that saves us time in filtering email". On the other hand, Palo Alto Networks WildFire is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Cisco Firepower NGFW Firewall, Cisco ASA Firewall, Juniper SRX and Proofpoint Email Protection, whereas STAXX is most compared with SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection, ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP), Fortinet FortiSandbox and Anomali Enterprise.

See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.

We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.