We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, RSA, Microsoft and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP). Updated: November 2021.
554,586 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

"For example, if a security Intel threat talks about an IOC. We can then go to our MSP and say, "Is there a signature for this particular type of malware that just came out?" And if they'll say yes, then we'll say, "Okay. Does it apply to these firewalls? And have we seen any hits on it?" There's absolutely value in it.""The way that the solution quickly updates to adjust to threats is the solution's most valuable aspect. When there's a security attack, within five minutes, all Wildfire subscribers have access to updates so that all systems will be safe. Its threat prevention is way better than other vendor products.""The most valuable feature of this solution is how it keeps up-to-date with viruses.""You have better control because you define apps. You just don't define ports. You define apps, and the apps are monitored in the traffic. It is more specific than the Cisco firewall when it comes to our needs.""The most valuable feature is the cloud-based protection against zero-day malware attacks.""The backup is the best feature.""The most valuable feature for us is the VPN.""The most valuable feature is the improved security that it offers."

More Palo Alto Networks WildFire Pros »

"ThreatConnect has a highly user-friendly interface.""The most valuable features are ease of use and the ability to customize it."

More ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Pros »

"When you contact support, there is no guarantee that they will be available to help you tackle the issue that you are facing.""It would be nice if there was an easier way to install and deploy it, such as through the inclusion of wizards.""The configuration should be made a little bit easier. I understand why it is as it is, but there should be a way to make it easier from the user side.""The threat intelligence that we receiving in the reporting was not as expected. We were expecting more. Additionally, we should be able to whitelist a specific file based on a variety of attributes.""The size of Palo Alto's cloud is big but it could be easier to use from a product management perspective.""The cost of the solution is excessively high.""Management and web filtering can be improved. There should also be better reporting, particularly around web filtering.""The automation and responsiveness need improvement."

More Palo Alto Networks WildFire Cons »

"They should make it a little bit easier to generate events and share them with the community""Integration is an area that could use some improvement."

More ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The physical appliance is around €3,000 or €4,000, and then, you have the licensing for a year for around €3,000.""The price of the Palo Alto Networks WildFire license is expensive. When it came time to renew the solution the price doubled.""We are on an annual subscription. When we purchased the firewall, we had activated this solutions license for a minimum of one year. The price of the solution is fair.""I think they should lower the price of this solution""This is an expensive product and the market for Palo Alto in Poland could be much bigger if the pricing was comparable to Fortinet.""The solution is overpriced.""It depends on the features. Additional features cost additional money as well.""The price is a bit higher than the other products such as TrendMicro, or FireEye."

More Palo Alto Networks WildFire Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The price could be better.""The price of this product is in the mid-range, not too expensive, nor inexpensive."

More ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Pricing and Cost Advice »

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.
554,586 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:  The Cisco Firepower NGFW Firewall is a very powerful and very complex piece of anti-viral software. When one considers that fact, it is all the more impressive that the setup is a fairly… more »
Top Answer: FortiGate has a lot going for it and I consider it to be the best, most user-friendly firewall out there. What I like the most about it is that it has an attractive web dashboard with very easy… more »
Top Answer: When looking to change our ASA Firewall, we looked into Palo Alto’s WildFire. It works especially in preventing advanced malware and zero-day exploits with real-time intelligence. The sandbox feature… more »
Top Answer: ThreatConnect has a highly user-friendly interface.
Top Answer: The price could be better. ThreatConnect is very expensive for a single user, but it maybe affordable for companies.
Top Answer: They should make it a little bit easier to generate events and share them with the community. Right now, it's a little complex to share with them or to download your events in a report. The price… more »
Average Words per Review
Average Words per Review
Learn More
WildFire™ cloud-based threat analysis service is the industry’s most advanced analysis and prevention engine for highly evasive zero-day exploits and malware. The cloud-based service employs a unique multi-technique approach combining dynamic and static analysis, innovative machine learning techniques, and a groundbreaking bare metal analysis environment to detect and prevent even the most evasive threats.

The ThreatConnect Platform was designed to help you understand adversaries, automate workflows, and mitigate threats using threat intelligence. ThreatConnect offers a suite of products built on platform of analytics and automation.

Learn more about Palo Alto Networks WildFire
Learn more about ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)
Sample Customers
Novamedia, Nexon Asia Pacific, Lenovo, Samsonite, IOOF, Sinogrid, SanDisk Corporation
Information Not Available
Top Industries
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm11%
Comms Service Provider26%
Computer Software Company23%
Energy/Utilities Company4%
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm9%
Company Size
Small Business51%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise37%
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise71%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, RSA, Microsoft and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP). Updated: November 2021.
554,586 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Palo Alto Networks WildFire is ranked 1st in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 17 reviews while ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is ranked 11th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 2 reviews. Palo Alto Networks WildFire is rated 8.4, while ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks WildFire writes "Good technical support and provides automatic analysis that saves us time in filtering email". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) writes "Ease to use, customizable, and they have responsive and knowledgeable support". Palo Alto Networks WildFire is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Cisco ASA Firewall, Cisco Firepower NGFW Firewall, Proofpoint Email Protection and Juniper SRX, whereas ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is most compared with Anomali Enterprise, Recorded Future, ThreatQ, Splunk Phantom and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR.

We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.