Compare Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Parasoft SOAtest

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Parasoft SOAtest? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: October 2020.
447,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The solution is rather expensive due to the security it has to offer."

More Panaya Test Dynamix Pricing and Cost Advice »

"They do have a confusing licensing structure."

More Parasoft SOAtest Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
447,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
22nd
Views
1,046
Comparisons
457
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
633
Avg. Rating
8.0
17th
Views
8,056
Comparisons
3,847
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
625
Avg. Rating
9.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As
Panaya Test CenterSOAtest
Learn
Panaya
Parasoft
Overview

With Panaya Test Dynamix, accelerate and standardize packaged application testing without compromising on scope or quality. By encompassing the needs of all stakeholders and integrating standardized testing processes for both technical IT and Business users, Panaya reduces overall testing efforts by 30-50%.

Parasoft SOAtest is widely recognized as the leading enterprise-grade solution for API testing and API integrity. Thoroughly test composite applications with robust support for REST and web services, plus an industry-leading 120+ protocols/message types.
Offer
Learn more about Panaya Test Dynamix
Learn more about Parasoft SOAtest
Sample Customers
Allianz Global Investors, AGC (Asahi Glass Company), OTTO Office, Etablissement Fran├žais du Sang, Eissmann Group Automotive, Aritzia, ABB BrazilLufthansa, Siemens, DirecTV, NZ Bank
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company41%
Comms Service Provider11%
Media Company11%
Construction Company6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm46%
Government15%
Manufacturing Company8%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider19%
Government8%
Financial Services Firm8%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise67%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: October 2020.
447,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Panaya Test Dynamix is ranked 22nd in Functional Testing Tools with 1 review while Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 17th in Functional Testing Tools with 1 review. Panaya Test Dynamix is rated 8.0, while Parasoft SOAtest is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Panaya Test Dynamix writes "I get a consolidated view and reporting and it enables us to build a workflow that we can customize to our requirements". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Creates tests automatically based on recorded traffic". Panaya Test Dynamix is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Worksoft Certify, Selenium HQ, Micro Focus UFT One and Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, whereas Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with Postman, SonarQube, SoapUI Pro, Tricentis Tosca and Coverity.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.