Compare Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Sauce Labs

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Panaya Test Dynamix Logo
1,046 views|457 comparisons
Sauce Labs Logo
6,281 views|3,756 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: October 2020.
446,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The solution is rather expensive due to the security it has to offer."

More Panaya Test Dynamix Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
446,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
22nd
Views
1,046
Comparisons
457
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
633
Avg. Rating
8.0
6th
Views
6,281
Comparisons
3,756
Reviews
11
Average Words per Review
489
Avg. Rating
8.5
Popular Comparisons
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As
Panaya Test Center
Learn
Panaya
Sauce Labs
Overview

With Panaya Test Dynamix, accelerate and standardize packaged application testing without compromising on scope or quality. By encompassing the needs of all stakeholders and integrating standardized testing processes for both technical IT and Business users, Panaya reduces overall testing efforts by 30-50%.

Sauce Labs provides the world's largest secure and highly scalable automation cloud for testing desktop, mobile web, native, and hybrid applications. Sauce Labs helps companies accelerate software development cycles, improve application quality, and deploy with confidence across 450+ browser/OS/device/platform combinations.

Offer
Learn more about Panaya Test Dynamix
Learn more about Sauce Labs
Sample Customers
Allianz Global Investors, AGC (Asahi Glass Company), OTTO Office, Etablissement Fran├žais du Sang, Eissmann Group Automotive, Aritzia, ABB BrazilSalesforce.com, Mozilla, Zendesk, Puppet Labs, Twitter, Bank of America, Eventbrite, Bleacher Report, Okta, Intuit, Travelocity, Sharecare, CapitalOne.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company45%
Media Company8%
Comms Service Provider7%
Construction Company6%
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company14%
Media Company13%
Marketing Services Firm9%
Computer Software Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company45%
Comms Service Provider10%
Media Company8%
Financial Services Firm7%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business27%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise52%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise57%
Large Enterprise28%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: October 2020.
446,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Panaya Test Dynamix is ranked 22nd in Functional Testing Tools with 1 review while Sauce Labs is ranked 6th in Functional Testing Tools with 11 reviews. Panaya Test Dynamix is rated 8.0, while Sauce Labs is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Panaya Test Dynamix writes "I get a consolidated view and reporting and it enables us to build a workflow that we can customize to our requirements". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sauce Labs writes "Helps us in reducing the number of manual testing". Panaya Test Dynamix is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Worksoft Certify, Selenium HQ, Micro Focus UFT One and Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, whereas Sauce Labs is most compared with BrowserStack, Perfecto Suite, CrossBrowserTesting, HeadSpin and SmartBear TestComplete.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.