Compare Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Silk Central

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: November 2020.
447,228 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The solution is rather expensive due to the security it has to offer."

More Panaya Test Dynamix Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The cost of this tool, in terms of licensing, is not large."

More Silk Central Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
447,228 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
13th
Views
1,046
Comparisons
457
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
633
Avg. Rating
8.0
10th
Views
1,296
Comparisons
692
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
1,007
Avg. Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As
Panaya Test CenterBorland Silk Central, Micro Focus Silk Central
Learn
Panaya
Micro Focus
Overview

With Panaya Test Dynamix, accelerate and standardize packaged application testing without compromising on scope or quality. By encompassing the needs of all stakeholders and integrating standardized testing processes for both technical IT and Business users, Panaya reduces overall testing efforts by 30-50%.

Silk Central is an open test management solution which unifies all test assets into one easy-to-use planning, tracking, reporting and execution hub. Silk Central enables you to gain control, collaboration and traceability across all areas of your software testing, whether your methodology is Agile, Traditional or hybrid. Silk Central provides integration of requirements, manual and automated tests, defect tools and your test execution, giving full traceability of the quality of your software testing regardless of role.
Offer
Learn more about Panaya Test Dynamix
Learn more about Silk Central
Sample Customers
Allianz Global Investors, AGC (Asahi Glass Company), OTTO Office, Etablissement Fran├žais du Sang, Eissmann Group Automotive, Aritzia, ABB BrazilAmBank Group, Krung Thai Computer Services, Deakin University
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company43%
Media Company12%
Comms Service Provider7%
Construction Company6%
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company25%
Financial Services Firm25%
Transportation Company25%
Manufacturing Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Financial Services Firm23%
Comms Service Provider10%
Government9%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Midsize Enterprise30%
Large Enterprise70%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: November 2020.
447,228 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Panaya Test Dynamix is ranked 13th in Test Management Tools with 1 review while Silk Central is ranked 10th in Test Management Tools with 1 review. Panaya Test Dynamix is rated 8.0, while Silk Central is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Panaya Test Dynamix writes "I get a consolidated view and reporting and it enables us to build a workflow that we can customize to our requirements". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Silk Central writes "A powerful platform and strong technical support help us to make the right decisions". Panaya Test Dynamix is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Worksoft Certify, Selenium HQ, Micro Focus UFT One and Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, whereas Silk Central is most compared with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, Adaptavist Test Management for Jira, Zephyr Enterprise, Tricentis qTest and TestRail by Gurock.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.