Compare Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Silk Test

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Panaya Test Dynamix Logo
1,046 views|457 comparisons
Silk Test Logo
5,366 views|3,530 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: October 2020.
447,439 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The solution is rather expensive due to the security it has to offer."

More Panaya Test Dynamix Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details."

More Silk Test Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
447,439 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The scalability of the solution is quite good. You can easily expand the product if you need to.
Top Answer: The solution has a lack of compatibility with newer technologies. When tests are recorded on to Silk Central, there is a bit of a lack of clarity in terms of what needs to be fed into Silk Central and… more »
Top Answer: The solution is generally a framework for test functional automation. We use it for automation of web applications for the most part.
Ranking
22nd
Views
1,046
Comparisons
457
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
633
Avg. Rating
8.0
15th
Views
5,366
Comparisons
3,530
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
625
Avg. Rating
7.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Also Known As
Panaya Test CenterSegue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test
Learn
Panaya
Micro Focus
Overview

With Panaya Test Dynamix, accelerate and standardize packaged application testing without compromising on scope or quality. By encompassing the needs of all stakeholders and integrating standardized testing processes for both technical IT and Business users, Panaya reduces overall testing efforts by 30-50%.

SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.
Offer
Learn more about Panaya Test Dynamix
Learn more about Silk Test
Sample Customers
Allianz Global Investors, AGC (Asahi Glass Company), OTTO Office, Etablissement Français du Sang, Eissmann Group Automotive, Aritzia, ABB BrazilKrung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company43%
Media Company12%
Comms Service Provider7%
Construction Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company41%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm11%
Insurance Company5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise62%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: October 2020.
447,439 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Panaya Test Dynamix is ranked 22nd in Functional Testing Tools with 1 review while Silk Test is ranked 15th in Functional Testing Tools with 5 reviews. Panaya Test Dynamix is rated 8.0, while Silk Test is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Panaya Test Dynamix writes "I get a consolidated view and reporting and it enables us to build a workflow that we can customize to our requirements". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Silk Test writes "An easy to use interface with a recording feature that our business users are happy with". Panaya Test Dynamix is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Worksoft Certify, Selenium HQ, Micro Focus UFT One and Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, whereas Silk Test is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus UFT One, Selenium HQ, Apache JMeter and Tricentis Tosca.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.