Most Helpful Review
Our automation engineers can create tests more easily, but the code editor gives poorly formatted code.
Test migration from HPE are done automatically. We can extract our tests from HPE, and they convert it into the Panaya format.
It is easy for business users to use who are not familiar with testing tools.
Provides better monitoring for testing campaigns and business process testing.
The database checkpoints detect problems which are difficult for a human resource to find.
Customer service and technical support responsiveness are high. Everyone is very professional.
Test items, project variables helps in managing automation suite and scheduling execution.
It's cross platform automation capabilities specially ranging across web, UNIX (via putty), and other systems.
The ability to run a whole suite of tests automatically (which we did overnight).
TestComplete fits almost perfectly with a large amount of stacks, such as Delphi, C#, Java and web applications.
Runs in different remote machines. We have multiple versions of the software being tested.
They provide options for custom fields or tabs, but customization of workflows would be great.
Support is reactive and in English only.
Name Mapping feature should be clearer. Whenever I use it, I do not really know what will work and what will not work.
Stability issues occurred only when connecting to the SourceSafe. Sometimes, after getting the latest version, the tool hangs and it should be reopened in order to recover.
Increased performance with less memory and CPU usage.
Error handling features in the tool are a little limited.
The code editor, though following eclipse-style, is still a work in progress and gives a very poorly formatted code once viewed via other editing tools.
We were testing handheld barcode scanners running WindowsCE with many menus of warehouse functions, and our biggest problem was the timing between input and responses.
TestComplete gives support to do requests to a SOAP web service but has no support to do HTTP requests on Restful services.
Product is not stable enough and it crashes often.
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
The license price for a physical machine is cheap, and for virtual machine, it is very expensive.
Our ROI is about $10,000 a year.
TestComplete now have come up with three modules (Web, Desktop & Mobile), so based on the type of product for automation, it is adequate to purchase the required module.
Buy modules on demand. If you have a four-person team and they will each automate tests only 25% of the time, it's better to buy a floating licence and share the tool during the work day.
The price is less, compared to other products, such as QTP.
My advice so far, is that while it’s not quite as powerful and easy to use as UFT, its price tag more than makes up for it.
The product is becoming more and more expensive.
See more Panaya Test Dynamix competitors »
Compared 100% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
See more SmartBear TestComplete competitors »
Compared 8% of the time.
Also Known As
|Also Known As||Panaya Test Center|
With Panaya Test Dynamix, accelerate and standardize packaged application testing without compromising on scope or quality. By encompassing the needs of all stakeholders and integrating standardized testing processes for both technical IT and Business users, Panaya reduces overall testing efforts by 30-50%.
TestComplete is a powerful and robust automated testing tool for mobile, web and desktop applications. Quickly and easily create accurate and repeatable tests across multiple devices, platforms and environments – regardless of experience level. It supports multiple languages, modern control sets and integrates with open source frameworks and tools like Selenium, SoapUI and Jenkins.
Learn more about Panaya Test Dynamix
Learn more about SmartBear TestComplete
|Sample Customers||Allianz Global Investors, AGC (Asahi Glass Company), OTTO Office, Etablissement Français du Sang, Eissmann Group Automotive, Aritzia, ABB Brazil||Cisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.|
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS