Panaya Test Dynamix vs. SmartBear TestComplete

Panaya Test Dynamix is ranked 23rd in Functional Testing Tools with 1 review vs SmartBear TestComplete which is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 15 reviews. The top reviewer of Panaya Test Dynamix writes "Provides better monitoring for testing campaigns and business process testing". The top reviewer of SmartBear TestComplete writes "Allows us to test both desktop and web applications". Panaya Test Dynamix is most compared with Worksoft Certify. SmartBear TestComplete is most compared with UFT (QTP), Ranorex and Selenium HQ.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools.
291,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Panaya Test Dynamix vs. SmartBear TestComplete

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
Test migration from HPE are done automatically. We can extract our tests from HPE, and they convert it into the Panaya format.It is easy for business users to use who are not familiar with testing tools.Provides better monitoring for testing campaigns and business process testing.

Read more »

The database checkpoints detect problems which are difficult for a human resource to find.Customer service and technical support responsiveness are high. Everyone is very professional.Test items, project variables helps in managing automation suite and scheduling execution.Selenium integration.It's cross platform automation capabilities specially ranging across web, UNIX (via putty), and other systems.The ability to run a whole suite of tests automatically (which we did overnight).TestComplete fits almost perfectly with a large amount of stacks, such as Delphi, C#, Java and web applications.Runs in different remote machines. We have multiple versions of the software being tested.

Read more »

Cons
They provide options for custom fields or tabs, but customization of workflows would be great.Support is reactive and in English only.

Read more »

Name Mapping feature should be clearer. Whenever I use it, I do not really know what will work and what will not work.Stability issues occurred only when connecting to the SourceSafe. Sometimes, after getting the latest version, the tool hangs and it should be reopened in order to recover.Increased performance with less memory and CPU usage.Error handling features in the tool are a little limited.The code editor, though following eclipse-style, is still a work in progress and gives a very poorly formatted code once viewed via other editing tools.We were testing handheld barcode scanners running WindowsCE with many menus of warehouse functions, and our biggest problem was the timing between input and responses.TestComplete gives support to do requests to a SOAP web service but has no support to do HTTP requests on Restful services.Product is not stable enough and it crashes often.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
The license price for a physical machine is cheap, and for virtual machine, it is very expensive.Our ROI is about $10,000 a year.TestComplete now have come up with three modules (Web, Desktop & Mobile), so based on the type of product for automation, it is adequate to purchase the required module.Buy modules on demand. If you have a four-person team and they will each automate tests only 25% of the time, it's better to buy a floating licence and share the tool during the work day.The price is less, compared to other products, such as QTP.My advice so far, is that while it’s not quite as powerful and easy to use as UFT, its price tag more than makes up for it.The product is becoming more and more expensive.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
291,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
155
Comparisons
99
Reviews
1
Followers
48
Avg. Rating
10.0
Views
30,132
Comparisons
13,013
Reviews
15
Followers
1,412
Avg. Rating
7.8
Top Comparisons
Top ComparisonsSee more Panaya Test Dynamix competitors »
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
See more SmartBear TestComplete competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsPanaya Test Center
Website/Video
Website/VideoPanaya
SmartBear Software
Overview
Overview

With Panaya Test Dynamix, accelerate and standardize packaged application testing without compromising on scope or quality. By encompassing the needs of all stakeholders and integrating standardized testing processes for both technical IT and Business users, Panaya reduces overall testing efforts by 30-50%.

TestComplete is a powerful and robust automated testing tool for mobileweb and desktop  applications. Quickly and easily create accurate and repeatable tests across multiple devices, platforms and environments – regardless of experience level. It supports multiple languages, modern control sets and integrates with open source frameworks and tools like Selenium, SoapUI and Jenkins.

OFFER
Learn more about Panaya Test Dynamix
Learn more about SmartBear TestComplete
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersAllianz Global Investors, AGC (Asahi Glass Company), OTTO Office, Etablissement Français du Sang, Eissmann Group Automotive, Aritzia, ABB BrazilCisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.
Top Industries
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Software R&D Company
13%
Retailer
13%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Manufacturing Company
13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Retailer
10%
Transportation Company
9%
Company Size
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business
15%
Midsize Enterprise
37%
Large Enterprise
49%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
16%
Midsize Enterprise
25%
Large Enterprise
59%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools.
Download now
291,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email