Compare Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Tricentis Tosca
Panaya Test Dynamix is ranked 20th in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews while Tricentis Tosca is ranked 1st in Functional Testing Tools with 9 reviews. Panaya Test Dynamix is rated 9.0, while Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Panaya Test Dynamix writes "I get a consolidated view and reporting and it enables us to build a workflow that we can customize to our requirements". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Having a regression suite that we can run gives us a high level of confidence in the changes we are making". Panaya Test Dynamix is most compared with Worksoft Certify, Tricentis Tosca and Micro Focus UFT One, whereas Tricentis Tosca is most compared with Micro Focus UFT One, Selenium HQ and SmartBear TestComplete. See our Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Tricentis Tosca report.
Most Helpful Review | |||||
|
| ||||
 Find out what your peers are saying about Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: January 2020. 398,259 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
The initial setup was not complex and the product itself is very easy to configure and use. Test migration from HPE are done automatically. We can extract our tests from HPE, and they convert it into the Panaya format. It is easy for business users to use who are not familiar with testing tools. Provides better monitoring for testing campaigns and business process testing. | This solution is easy to use for everybody, including those who are not IT-educated. The Model-Based Test Automation is the most valuable feature, where you can create reusable components. Even though we are using a scriptless automation tool, there still needs to be an understanding of how to create reusable components and how to keep refactoring and how to keep regression, the test scripts, at an okay level. We are coupling Tosca with some other risk-based testing tools, as well, but automation is primarily what we're using Tosca for, the scriptless, model-based technology which is driving automation for us. Tosca BI is important to make sure that our data integrity is in check and validated; to make sure our data is good. Our data is the number-one important driver for our company, so if that's not good, we have some big problems. The solution is script-less, so you don't need IT knowledge to use the solution in an operational way. This is the most valuable feature. It's also only one of two or three tools that can do good automation on SAP, and in my opinion, it's the best of those. It has helped teams within our organization become more aware of the testing requirements in terms of risk and priority. Compared to other tools we have been looking at, you don't have to be a programmer to operate it, though it helps. It also a product that can be used by business people. We are satisfied with the support of Tricentis. We have multiple applications, and it supports parallel execution. It has mobile automation. |
Cons | |
They provide options for custom fields or tabs, but customization of workflows would be great. Support is reactive and in English only. | I would like to be able to manage different projects in one repository or have better data exchange between repositories. There have been some setbacks because of upgrades. While Tosca has been around for a while, Tricentis has catered to smaller clients and I don't think they have done such a large, at-scale transition or transformation before or worked with a company like ours, which is doing an enterprise-wide transformation. When we go to their customer advisory-board meetings, upgrades have been an issue. They have been working a lot to make upgrades seamless. The main area where there is room for improvement is how they do upgrades. Going through this current upgrade, we were delayed a month because we are using a third-party tool. It's called Tosca Connect by Tasktop. When this latest upgrade broke that relationship between the two, it took Tricentis a month to come back with a workable solution... Their whole upgrade process needs to be better and cleaner, from an end-user standpoint. The solution should work with the Linux platform. Right now, it only runs on Windows. Not being able to mask test data in relation to testing data management, in my opinion, is also a limitation. Setup wasn't that straightforward; it was more complex. It all depends on the environment, because there were a lot of errors on our applications. Therefore, it wasn't an easy setup for us. It needs better integration with JIRA. I would like a better user interface. |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
The solution is rather expensive due to the security it has to offer. | We have around 200 [concurrent] licenses and the cost around $1.4 million a year. Tricentis Tosca may be relatively on the higher side in terms of pricing, but their sales rep can give pretty decent deals when asked. We hired a consultant to figure out all the tools in our company and how they fit in our company before we purchased the solution. |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs. 398,259 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 740 Comparisons 324 Reviews 2 Average Words per Review 451 Avg. Rating 9.0 | Views 36,969 Comparisons 15,138 Reviews 9 Average Words per Review 1,221 Avg. Rating 8.3 |
Top Comparisons | |
 Compared 25% of the time.  Compared 24% of the time.  Compared 20% of the time. | Compared 21% of the time.  Compared 8% of the time.  Compared 7% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| Panaya Test Center | |
Learn | |
| Panaya | Tricentis |
Overview | |
With Panaya Test Dynamix, accelerate and standardize packaged application testing without compromising on scope or quality. By encompassing the needs of all stakeholders and integrating standardized testing processes for both technical IT and Business users, Panaya reduces overall testing efforts by 30-50%. | Tricentis Tosca specializes in enabling large enterprises to improve the quality of their applications by equipping them to optimize, manage, and automate their software testing. Tosca's model-based approach to software test automation enables enterprises to achieve high automation rates while maximizing business risk coverage. Tricentis Tosca also provides market-leading test case design and planning capabilities, test data provisioning, service virtualization, mobile testing, and more. Tosca is fully compatible with other testing solutions and Application Lifecycle Management products. Tricentis also offers uniquely designed testing solutions for SAP, ServiceNow, Trax, Avaloq, and Oracle. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Panaya Test Dynamix | Learn more about Tricentis Tosca |
Sample Customers | |
| Allianz Global Investors, AGC (Asahi Glass Company), OTTO Office, Etablissement Français du Sang, Eissmann Group Automotive, Aritzia, ABB Brazil | HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone |
Top Industries | |
No Data Available | Financial Services Firm30% Insurance Company15% Retailer10% Manufacturing Company10% Software R&D Company36% Comms Service Provider13% Financial Services Firm9% Manufacturing Company8% |
Company Size | |
No Data Available | Small Business15% Midsize Enterprise25% Large Enterprise60% Small Business7% Midsize Enterprise9% Large Enterprise83% |
Find out what your peers are saying about Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
398,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See also Panaya Test Dynamix Reviews, Tricentis Tosca Reviews, and our list of Best Functional Testing Tools Companies.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.