Compare Panda Security Adaptive Defense vs. SentinelOne

Panda Security Adaptive Defense is ranked 39th in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 1 review while SentinelOne is ranked 11th in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 11 reviews. Panda Security Adaptive Defense is rated 0, while SentinelOne is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Panda Security Adaptive Defense writes "Enables you to drill down and get a good overview of which applications you are using that are connecting a player to the next local operation center". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SentinelOne writes "Does what a first-level SOC analyst would do, notifying us of, and remediating, issues at that level". Panda Security Adaptive Defense is most compared with Microsoft Windows Defender, ESET Endpoint Security and Kaspersky Endpoint Security, whereas SentinelOne is most compared with Cylance, CrowdStrike and Carbon Black CB Defense.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Panda Security Adaptive Defense? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Symantec, Microsoft, HCL and others in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business. Updated: February 2020.
397,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The feature I find most valuable is the advance search engine.

Read more »

The strength of SentinelOne is that it has an automated, active EDR. It does that first level of what a SOC analyst would do, automatically, using artificial intelligence, so we can focus on other things. Active EDR not only notifies you, but it actually fixes that first level. That is unheard of. Very few, if any, companies do that.We love the API. We use it to generate robust reporting, and we also developed tools to perform agent actions remotely without needing to provide all IT staff with console access.It has the ability to rollback a ransomware infection instantly and with minimal disruption to the user & provides robust reporting.The solution offers very rich details surrounding threats or attacks.We have a preference for their receptor. It's good at finding many EFC files. EFC files could have a virus.The most valuable feature of this solution is the user-friendly interface.All of the features are valuable. The way that it integrates into management with fault correction capabilities over is especially valuable. Any of the full gamut of the features that it provides are useful to us.I have found the activity timeline and threat analysis to be particularly useful.

Read more »

Cons
I would like to see better data protection.

Read more »

The area where it could be improved is reporting. They have some online reporting, but it would be nice to be able to pick and choose. When I'm looking at the console, I would love to be able to pull certain things into a report, the things that are specific to me.It would be nice if the console stored data daily, so that you could look at a timeline of events on a machine over a period of time, and currently this is not possible.Set up is very labor-intensive.The solution needs better reporting on new threats and malware. The reporting is present, but I can't find the information easily.It's fine. It's correcting all the EFC files with a virus. All the achievements, maximum EFC files. Many EFC files will be flagged as a virus. Some virus databases need to be updated. The model is good at finding many EFC files. The trouble is it needs to be updated.This solution would be more attractive to customers if the price were lower.In terms of improvement, I would like to see better alerting to let us know if there is anything wrong with SentinelOne working on the endpoint of the computer.I would like to see something a little more sophisticated than simply being able to mark a false positive as safe or there's usually just one or two options in certain areas and they're a little rudimentary at this stage.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Our licensing fee is 1M Euro per month, so it is about 80 Euro's per user.

Read more »

The larger count you have, the deeper discount you will receive in your contract.The per-seat cost is low, but you have to commit to a certain number of licenses for a year.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business solutions are best for your needs.
397,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
3,990
Comparisons
3,009
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
656
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
18,367
Comparisons
12,749
Reviews
9
Average Words per Review
442
Avg. Rating
8.7
Top Comparisons
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Also Known As
Panda Security Adaptive Defense 360, Panda Security Endpoint Protection, Panda Security for DesktopsSentinel Labs
Learn
Panda Security
SentinelOne
Overview

Adaptive Defense 360 is a cyber-security service that combines next-generation protection (NG EPP) and detection and remediation technologies (EDR), with the ability to classify 100% of running processes.

SentinelOne delivers autonomous endpoint protection through a single agent that successfully prevents, detects, responds, and hunts attacks across all major vectors. Designed for extreme ease of use, the S1 platform saves customers time by applying AI to automatically eliminate threats in real-time for both on-premise and cloud environments and is the only solution to provide full visibility across networks directly from the endpoint. To learn more visit www.sentinelone.com or follow us at @SentinelOne, on LinkedIn or Facebook.

Offer
Learn more about Panda Security Adaptive Defense
Learn more about SentinelOne
Sample Customers
Indra, Valea AB, Fineit, Aemcom, Data Solutions INC., Gloucestershire NHS, Golden Star Resources Ltd, Hispania Racing Team, Instituto Dos Museus e da ConserÊo, Escuelas Pias Provincia Emaus, Axiom Housing Association, Municipality of Bjuv, Lesedi Nuclear, Mullsj_ municipality, Eng. skolan Norr AB, Dalakraft AB, Peter Green Haulage LtdHavas, Flex, Estee Lauder, McKesson, Norfolk Southern, JetBlue, Norwegian airlines, TGI Friday, AVX, Fim Bank
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company23%
Comms Service Provider12%
Media Company9%
Retailer7%
Find out what your peers are saying about Symantec, Microsoft, HCL and others in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business. Updated: February 2020.
397,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.