Compare Pandora FMS vs. Zabbix

Pandora FMS is ranked 17th in Network Monitoring Software with 11 reviews while Zabbix which is ranked 1st in Network Monitoring Software with 15 reviews. Pandora FMS is rated 9.4, while Zabbix is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Pandora FMS writes "Single-point continuous supervision makes it efficient for detecting and solving problems". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Reasonable network monitoring which works okay if you don't mind the glitches". Pandora FMS is most compared with Zabbix, SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor and Opsview Monitor, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Nagios XI and Icinga. See our Pandora FMS vs. Zabbix report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
36,568 views|18,826 comparisons
Pandora FMS Logo
899 views|429 comparisons
Zabbix Logo
76,852 views|33,116 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Pandora FMS vs. Zabbix and other solutions. Updated: July 2019.
353,345 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most valuable feature is the ability to span multiple technologies and multiple vendors.It is a central solution in terms of how to actually use it. It has a very easy dashboard. Everything is concise. We are able to create custom sensors. For different parts of the business, we have many products across many environments, and it works for everything.We can see trends for a lot of different things, such as hard drive space and bandwidth usage. We can see and plan for the future by knowing, "We're sort of at 75% capacity now. In three months time, we know we're going to be up to 90%,so we need to plan ahead for it, getting upgrades booked in place." Since things like this take time and effort, it's handy to see trends into the future of where our company is going.The solution provides us with needed feedback on our IT infrastructure. It gives us really good quality of service when it comes to monitoring of available space and available resources. It allows us to preempt issues before they become a problem for the business.It is easy to use and intuitive, which is really important. It does what it says on the box by giving you a visual of the state of what is going on at any one time.It is pretty simple to use, which is always a good thing. It's been very reliable in updating us if any issues crop up.We use the remote probes a lot for our branch offices. Instead of deploying the full instance of PRTG, we'll put a remote probe out there. This simplifies the whole deployment for us.There is a simplicity to setting up the extra sensors. It's really easy for us to build infrastructure and start monitoring very quickly.

Read more »

Thanks to its flexibility, I have been able to adapt the tool to our servers and find out quickly how their console works.The official forum is active enough to answer most of the high-end technical questions that you may have.This solution has screens that are easy to understand and provide a wealth of information.I like this solution a lot because it has a very large Hispanic community and the platform looks very friendly.It provides us with proactive monitoring and is very easy to configure and maintain.What I value most about Pandora FMS is the simplicity of working with it.We are able to control our business with this all-in-one monitoring tool.You can configure several types of architecture for high availability or load balancing.

Read more »

Simple network monitoring that is easy to install and manage.We have two important servers. One server is an educational server. The second server is an enterprise server which we need to support about 24,000 clients. We needed these servers to operate very well. We needed to prevent the servers from crashing. Zabbix helped us in this way.Working on OS level features helps us do real analyses to determine conditions.Zabbix can use old data to current data to set the threshold. We can use previous data to set the threshold.We use it to monitor and manage our servers.Every new asset placed in the environment can be automatically detected, predicting human failures.It can send messages to our ticketing system.It has good graphs of what is going on within the operating system.​

Read more »

Cons
The dashboarding definitely needs improvement.With custom sensors, there is a lot of work which needs to be done in the background, just for it to be tailor-made for the specific thing that we are actually monitoring. We take a lot of time with the custom sensors. I would like to see the customer sensor be more robust and a bit more varied.The only sort of limitation is the actual probes. So, if you don't have enough probes on there, you can over flip them and cause the WMI sensors and SNMP sensors to sort of overload. Sometimes, they might timeout for a minute, but they do come back.The desktop app is the one area where it do with some improvement. From a user's perspective, I would like to be able to get more out of the desktop app as opposed to where we are now with it.While the desktop app is good, they could slightly improve it. We would like it to be a single pane of glass. At the moment, you can only see certain portions of information. You have to scroll through to make it more granular. We want them to develop the desktop app to be more user-friendly.Once you start going above 5000 sensors, things do start to get a bit shaky. There are some best practice out there that you will need to adopt and be aware of.We would like more cloud native sensors for AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, etc. A lot of businesses are moving in that direction, so having something where we can pull performance stats out of these cloud services would be great for us.The thing that we do struggle with a bit is in the historic data. If I want look over 30 days, because it averages out onto one graph, you can't zoom in and drill down information.

Read more »

I sincerely believe that Pandora needs new ideas for functionality closer to advanced device security monitoring.Pandora FMS is an overall great monitoring solution, but it does not have a community that is as large as Zabbix or Nagios.I would like to have a dashboard with all assets displayed, with a quick hover-over status.I find that this software is resource heavy, and demands a lot of processing capacity.I think some improvements to the Android app would be good.The price for Pandora FMS is expensive.Third-party integration should be improved for some commonly used products.A nice feature in the next release would be an automation module to run workflow actions.

Read more »

The product delivers false positives during reporting because of flapping. Other reasonably priced alternatives may have better performance.The Zabbix dashboard is somewhat complicated. I like to use this product to monitor the network. I like to have a dashboard to monitor our situation and the correctness of other routers.Adding a mapping subsystem would be helpful.I want Zabbix to improve the UX/UI. Zabbix doesn't use a JavaScript chart for images, and I want them to improve this.Correlation of events would be a wonderful addition.​I would like to better be able to monitor Oracle processes.​Look and feel.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
We have an unlimited perpetual license, so we just pay support costs and it can scale throughout the organization.We used a product called SolarWinds in the past, and its cost was high. Whereas, PRTG came in at a third of SolarWind's cost.Cost was a factor when selecting this solution, but it just did everything we wanted it to do.Our licensing costs are 10,000 euros over three years.We looked at PRTG and SolarWinds. From a cost side perspective, compared to PRTG, and from what you get back from it, PRTG was sort of a hands down the winner.While I am not the person who deals with pricing, I would say that we pay around 1000 pounds a year.It is about £4,500 for the first year, then about another 15 to 20 percent annually after that. So, we are looking at about £1000 running costs a year. When you think about how much an outage costs per minute, it's negligible.If you are not too sure about it, try the free version. Then, if you like it, you can go to the paid version and roll it out.

Read more »

In terms of money, the Enterprise version is the cheapest that I have found after a market study.My rule of thumb would be that if you need more than thirty agents, and you lack an automation tool such as Chef or Puppet, you will save a lot of time and money going to the Enterprise edition.You get the license and it includes updates, new versions, and access to the complete library of modules.Pandora FMS is easy to implement and the pricing of licenses is competitive.Only one payment and it includes support, updates, new versions, and access to the complete library of plugins except for SAP and z/OS.

Read more »

It is free, which allows us to reduce costs.It is worth every cent to pay or even study to do your own installation.We’re using the free version, which covers all our current needs.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
353,345 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 33% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Also Known As
PRTG
Learn
Paessler AG
Artica Soluciones Tecnologicas
Zabbix
Overview
PRTG Network Monitor runs on a Windows machine within your network, collecting various statistics from the machines, software, and devices which you designate. PRTG comes with an easy-to-use web interface with point-and-click configuration. You can easily share data from it with non-technical colleagues and customers, including via live graphs and custom reports. This will let you plan for network expansion, see what applications are using most of your connection, and make sure that no one is hogging the entire network just to torrent videos.

Pandora FMS Enterprise is the perfect monitoring software for companies with at least 100 devices. 

Stop wasting your time and resources on complex and silo'd monitoring systems that are poorly integrated.

It’s an all-in-one package offering modern and flexible IT monitoring, replacing the need for multiple, difficult-to-integrate, and more costly monitoring systems.

Zabbix is the ultimate enterprise-level software designed for real-time monitoring of millions of metrics collected from tens of thousands of servers, virtual machines and network devices. Zabbix is Open Source and comes at no cost.

Offer
Get Started Today

Try it for 30 Days

Learn more about Pandora FMS
Learn more about Zabbix
Sample Customers
Jameson Bank, Sidnix, RungeICT, MedicalAnimal, Truck-lite, GamingGrids, The Covell Group, Forsythn County Schools, NetMass, Musgrove Park Hospital, Lanes Health, Columbia Southern University, Vodafone, Intrust BankRakuten, Prosegur, Repsol, Teléfonica, Salvensen, Ottawa Hospital, HughesBodybuilding.com, LLC., ITtelligent Consulting Services,Eltele AS, Total Server Solutions, LLC., ChinaNetCloud
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm13%
Comms Service Provider13%
Construction Company9%
Non Profit4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm14%
Comms Service Provider9%
Pharma/Biotech Company9%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Engineering Company84%
Recreational Facilities And Services Company10%
Healthcare Company3%
Software R&D Company1%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm17%
University17%
Media Company8%
K 12 Educational Company Or School8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider19%
K 12 Educational Company Or School12%
Financial Services Firm12%
University11%
Find out what your peers are saying about Pandora FMS vs. Zabbix and other solutions. Updated: July 2019.
353,345 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email