We performed a comparison between Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) and VMware ThinApp based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix, Microsoft, VMware and others in Application Virtualization.More Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) is ranked 5th in Application Virtualization with 24 reviews while VMware ThinApp is ranked 4th in Application Virtualization. Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) is rated 8.8, while VMware ThinApp is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) writes "Provides good scalability and a secure environment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware ThinApp writes "Streamlines checking our app after pushing an update, which helps cut costs". Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) is most compared with Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service), Citrix Workspace, VMware Workstation and Parallels Desktop, whereas VMware ThinApp is most compared with Microsoft App-V, Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service), Numecent and Inuvika.
See our list of best Application Virtualization vendors.
We monitor all Application Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.