We performed a comparison between Parasoft Development Testing Platform and Polarion Requirements based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management."It really helps developers execute scenarios through DTP and share reports/results across the teams."
"The most valuable feature is code coverage."
"Its flexibility and APIs are the most valuable."
"My company mainly utilizes the product for documenting internal standards, guidelines, and requirements. Currently, we're focusing on using it for internal purposes, but the vision is to expand its usage to include contract requirements and tracking functionalities. While we're not there yet, it has proven effective for managing our internal documentation needs."
"Polarion Requirements' most valuable features are link tracing, book entry, and sequence training features."
"The solution is especially great for organizing folders effectively."
"We can easily customize it because of the web services and open APIs. Also, the APIs are available. We integrated Polarion with one of Siemens' products, Teamcenter, which is especially useful for automotive industries. There is an open API for integration with Jira as well, so for me, customization is a strong point."
"The biggest improvement would be in the transparency we have now. We have very complex products. We make whole systems with difficult and diverse areas such as hardware, software, mechanical and printing, etc. To get the overview of all the requirements into a system, at that sizing, is the main advantage we have in the organization now."
"A valuable feature from my side would be the comparison corporization."
"We worked with the web interface."
"Parallel execution: It would help it multiple executions could be done at the same time."
"The solution's speed has room for improvement."
"It is not a stable solution, as we had issues with shared licenses."
"One thing to consider is increased flexibility in terms of workflow configuration."
"It is stable enough but if you would like to work with more requirement objects, then you will get timeouts."
"The risk assessment functionality needs improvement, like FMEA risk management."
"Polarion Requirement needs to have a feature where we can track changes and compare documents. Currently, we do it manually."
"The usability of the solution should also be improved."
"Its user interface could be more user friendly. In addition, a lot of features are missing for test management. It should have the test case ordering feature."
"If we have more than one thousand work items in one live-book then it becomes almost unusable."
Parasoft Development Testing Platform is ranked 10th in Application Requirements Management with 4 reviews while Polarion Requirements is ranked 3rd in Application Requirements Management with 12 reviews. Parasoft Development Testing Platform is rated 8.6, while Polarion Requirements is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Parasoft Development Testing Platform writes "Provides 100 percent code coverage, is stable, and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Polarion Requirements writes "Defines, builds, tests and manages complex software systems". Parasoft Development Testing Platform is most compared with Codebeamer, whereas Polarion Requirements is most compared with IBM Rational DOORS, Jama Connect, Jira, IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation and Helix ALM.
See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.
We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
