Parasoft Development Testing Platform vs SmarteSoft comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Parasoft Development Testing Platform and SmarteSoft based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:The most valuable feature is code coverage.
Top Answer:The solution's speed has room for improvement.
Top Answer:We use the Parasoft Development Testing Platform to verify code coverage for static analysis in our unit tests.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
200
Comparisons
154
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
217
Rating
8.0
Views
57
Comparisons
41
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Parasoft Concerto, Parasoft DTP
Learn More
SmarteSoft
Video Not Available
Overview

Parasoft DTP aggregates the results from across testing practices, providing intelligent and continuous monitoring of the testing outcomes for greater visibility into what is working — and what isn’t.  Includes:

- Comprehensive Reports & Dashboards

- Preconfigured compliance reporting

- Customized Advanced Analytics

- Interactive Navigation of Results

- Traceability

SmarteSoft Application Lifecycle Management is a real-time collaboration, access to a centralized data repository, cross-tool and cross-project visibility, better project monitoring and reporting are the keys to developing quality software in less time. SmarteQM seamlessly integrates all these priorities, optimizing the experience of Integrated Application Lifecycle Management, or Integrated ALM; all the tools and users are synchronized with each other throughout the application development stages. This integration ensures that every team member knows who, what, when, and why of any changes made during the development process and there is no last-minute surprise causing delivery delays or project failure.
Sample Customers
General Motors, Lockheed Martin, Qualcomm, AAI Textron, Boeing, Fidelity, Johnson & Johnson, CIBC, Penske, Thales, Dell, 
New Zealand Blood Service, Columbian Financial Group, Proxibid, Entegraty Professional Services, Fremont Investment & Loan, Indiana Pension Systems, Posera Software, Lockheed Martin Space & Strategic Missiles, Allaire Corporation, ADP, PacifiCare, VP Technology
Buyer's Guide
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Parasoft Development Testing Platform is ranked 15th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 4 reviews while SmarteSoft is ranked 30th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Parasoft Development Testing Platform is rated 8.6, while SmarteSoft is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Parasoft Development Testing Platform writes "Provides 100 percent code coverage, is stable, and scalable". On the other hand, Parasoft Development Testing Platform is most compared with Codebeamer, whereas SmarteSoft is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.