Parasoft SOAtest vs Perforce QA Wizard Pro comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Parasoft Logo
815 views|564 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Perforce Logo
120 views|80 comparisons
0% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Parasoft SOAtest and Perforce QA Wizard Pro based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Every imaginable source in the entire world of information technology can be accessed and used.""Generating new messages, based on the existing .EDN and .XML messages, is a crucial part or the testing project that I’m currently in.""Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports.""Automatic testing is the most valuable feature.""The solution is scalable.""Technical support is helpful.""Parasoft SOAtest has improved the quality of our automated web services, which can be easily implemented through service chaining and service virtualization.""The testing time is shortened because we generate test data automatically with SOAtest."

More Parasoft SOAtest Pros →

"The most valuable feature is the option to pull changes from others or make local changes in your own change list."

More Perforce QA Wizard Pro Pros →

Cons
"Reporting facilities can be better.""The performance could be a bit better.""From an automation point of view, it should have better clarity and be more user friendly.""Tuning the tool takes time because it gives quite a long list of warnings.""The summary reports could be improved.""The product is very slow to start up, and that is a bit of a problem, actually.""During the process of working with SOAtest and building test cases, the .TST files will grow. A negative side effect is that saving your changes takes more time.""The feedback that we received from the DevOps of our organization was that the tool was a little heavy from the transformation perspective."

More Parasoft SOAtest Cons →

"It would be very helpful if a queue was implemented to handle, for example, 100 requests at the same time."

More Perforce QA Wizard Pro Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."
  • "The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."
  • "I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."
  • "It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."
  • "We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."
  • "The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."
  • "They do have a confusing licensing structure."
  • "The price is around $5,000 USD."
  • More Parasoft SOAtest Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports.
    Top Answer:Tuning the tool takes time because it gives quite a long list of warnings. Going through that is a challenge. It only happens in the initial stage when we are setting up the tool, but it can be… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    23rd
    Views
    815
    Comparisons
    564
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    440
    Rating
    7.0
    40th
    Views
    120
    Comparisons
    80
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SOAtest
    Learn More
    Overview

    Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

    SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

    QA Wizard Pro automates functional and regression testing of web, Windows, and Java applications, and load test web applications.

    Sample Customers
    Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife
    Ubisoft, Expedia, Honda, Samsung,Citrix
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm43%
    Government14%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm32%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government5%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise69%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise75%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 23rd in Functional Testing Tools with 30 reviews while Perforce QA Wizard Pro is ranked 40th in Functional Testing Tools. Parasoft SOAtest is rated 8.2, while Perforce QA Wizard Pro is rated 5.0. The top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Reliable with a good interface but uses too much memory". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Perforce QA Wizard Pro writes "Shared change lists are helpful, but poor scalability leads to problems with instability". Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with Postman, SonarQube, Coverity, Polyspace Code Prover and Klocwork, whereas Perforce QA Wizard Pro is most compared with .

    See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.