Compare Parasoft SOAtest vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 13th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 2 reviews while Rapid7 InsightAppSec is ranked 19th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 2 reviews. Parasoft SOAtest is rated 9.6, while Rapid7 InsightAppSec is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Improved the quality of our automated web services". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightAppSec writes "Excellent web scanning, good technical support, but lacks decent reporting". Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with Postman, SonarQube, SoapUI Pro, Tricentis Tosca and Coverity, whereas Rapid7 InsightAppSec is most compared with Rapid7 AppSpider, OWASP Zap, Qualys Web Application Scanning, Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner and PortSwigger Burp. See our Parasoft SOAtest vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Veracode Logo
66,657 views|35,722 comparisons
Parasoft SOAtest Logo
8,130 views|3,865 comparisons
Rapid7 InsightAppSec Logo
1,928 views|1,381 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
430,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
Veracode's cloud-based approach, coupled with the appliance that lets us use Veracode to scan internal-only web applications, has provided a seamless, always-up-to-date application security scanning solution.The source composition analysis component is great because it gives our developers some comfort in using new libraries.Integrations into our developer's IDE (Greenlight) and the DevOps Pipeline SAST / SourceClear Integrations has particularly increased our time to market and confidence.Veracode is a valuable tool in our secure SDLC process.We used it for performing security checks. We have many Java applications and Android applications. Essentially it was used for checking the security validations for compliance purposes.I have used this solution in multiple projects for vulnerability testing and finding security leaks within the code.The most valuable feature comes from the fact that it is cloud-based, and I can scale up without having to worry about any other infrastructure needs.We are using the Veracode tools to expose the engineers to the security vulnerabilities that were introduced with the new features, i.e. a lot faster or sooner in the development life cycle.

More Veracode Pros »

They have a feature where they can record traffic and create tests on the report traffic.Parasoft SOAtest has improved the quality of our automated web services, which can be easily implemented through service chaining and service virtualization.We can automate our scenarios in a data driven format, which shows there is no rework on scripts. We only need to update the test data and run for a number of scenarios.

More Parasoft SOAtest Pros »

The initial setup for us was easy enough. We didn't face too many issues. Deployment took maybe 30 minutes. It's quite quick and doesn't cause too much trouble at the outset.We have seen measurable decrease in the mean time to respond to threats by 20 percent.

More Rapid7 InsightAppSec Pros »

Cons
One feature I would like would be more selectivity in email alerts. While I like getting these, I would like to be able to be more granular in which ones I receive.I think for us the biggest improvement would be to have an indicator when there's something wrong with a scan.Improve Mobile Application Dynamic Scanning DAST - .ipa and .apkIt needs better controls to include/exclude specific sections when creating a report that can be shared externally with customers and prospects.One of the things that we have from a reporting point of view, is that we would love to see a graphical report. If you look through a report for something that has come back from Veracode, it takes a whole lot of time to just go through all the pages of the code to figure out exactly what it says. We know certain areas don’t have the greatest security features but those are usually minor and we don’t want to see those types of notifications.Ideally, I would like better reporting that gives me a more concise and accurate description of what my pain points are, and how to get to them.I would like to see expanded coverage for supporting more platforms, frameworks, and languages.Veracode should make it easier to navigate between the solutions that they offer, i.e. between dynamic, static, and the source code analysis.

More Veracode Cons »

The product is very slow to start up, and that is a bit of a problem, actually.Reports could be customized and more descriptive according to the user's or company's requirements.

More Parasoft SOAtest Cons »

The reporting is definitely an aspect of the solution that's in need of some work. We found that we'd try to use widgets, but often getting them to work for us wasn't very clear. They need to be more user friendly or offer better instructions.I would like more details of what the product can do.

More Rapid7 InsightAppSec Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
For the value we get out of it, coupled with the live defect review sessions, we find it an effective value for the money. We are a larger organization.They have just streamlined the licensing and they have a number of flexible options available, so overall it is quite good, albeit pricey.They just changed their pricing model two weeks ago. They went from a per-app license to a per-megabyte license. I know that the dynamic scan was $500 per app. Static analysis was about $4500 yearly. The license is only for the number of users, it doesn't matter what data you put in there. That was the old model. I do not know how the new model works.Veracode has been fair. We use their SaaS solution and it's just an annual subscription.No issues, the pricing seems reasonable.

More Veracode Pricing and Cost Advice »

They do have a confusing licensing structure.We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%.The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process.

More Parasoft SOAtest Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
430,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Compared 51% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Also Known As
SOAtestInsightAppSec
Learn
Veracode
Parasoft
Rapid7
Overview

Veracode covers all your Application Security needs in one solution through a combination of five analysis types; static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition analysis, interactive application security testing, and penetration testing. Unlike on-premise solutions that are hard to scale and focused on finding rather than fixing, Veracode comprises a unique combination of SaaS technology and on-demand expertise that enables DevSecOps through integration with your pipeline, and empowers developers to find and fix security defects.

Parasoft SOAtest is widely recognized as the leading enterprise-grade solution for API testing and API integrity. Thoroughly test composite applications with robust support for REST and web services, plus an industry-leading 120+ protocols/message types.

Your web applications may be complex, but your application security testing tool doesn’t need to be. InsightAppSec brings Rapid7’s proven Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) technology to the Insight platform, combining powerful application crawling and attack capabilities, flexibility in scan scope and scheduling, and accuracy in results with a modern UI, intuitive workflows, and sensible data organization. This enables you to identify XSS, SQL injection, CSRF, and other vulnerabilities with unparalleled ease. The best part? All of these capabilities are delivered via the cloud so that you’re up and running in minutes to identify the critical security risks that exist in your applications.

Offer
Learn more about Veracode
Learn more about Parasoft SOAtest
Learn more about Rapid7 InsightAppSec
Sample Customers
State of Missouri, ReknerLufthansa, Siemens, DirecTV, NZ BankCenterPoint Energy, CPA Australia, Hypertherm, First American Financial Corporation, Rackspace
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm34%
Insurance Company14%
Consumer Goods Company7%
Healthcare Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company43%
Comms Service Provider12%
Media Company6%
Insurance Company5%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm46%
Government15%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
Insurance Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company37%
Comms Service Provider14%
Government9%
Financial Services Firm5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company48%
Comms Service Provider16%
Media Company7%
Government5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise53%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise72%
REVIEWERS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise67%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
430,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.