Compare Parasoft SOAtest vs. Silk Test

Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 3 reviews while Silk Test is ranked 17th in Functional Testing Tools with 3 reviews. Parasoft SOAtest is rated 9.0, while Silk Test is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Offers the possibility for continuous testing using the server-side (nightly) batch runs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Silk Test writes "An easy to use interface with a recording feature that our business users are happy with". Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with SoapUI Pro, SonarQube and Postman, whereas Silk Test is most compared with Micro Focus UFT One, LoadRunner and Selenium HQ. See our Parasoft SOAtest vs. Silk Test report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Parasoft SOAtest Logo
7,387 views|3,373 comparisons
Silk Test Logo
5,215 views|3,670 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. Silk Test and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
389,772 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
They have a feature where they can record traffic and create tests on the report traffic.Parasoft SOAtest has improved the quality of our automated web services, which can be easily implemented through service chaining and service virtualization.We can automate our scenarios in a data driven format, which shows there is no rework on scripts. We only need to update the test data and run for a number of scenarios.

Read more »

The major thing it has helped with is to reduce the workload on testing activities.The feature I like most is the ease of reporting.The ability to develop scripts in Visual Studio, Visual Studio integration, is the most valuable feature.

Read more »

Cons
The product is very slow to start up, and that is a bit of a problem, actually.Reports could be customized and more descriptive according to the user's or company's requirements.

Read more »

The support for automation with iOS applications can be better.The pricing is an issue, the program is very expensive. That is something that can improve.They should extend some of the functions that are a bit clunky and improve the integration.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
They do have a confusing licensing structure.We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%.The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process.

Read more »

Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
389,772 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
14th
Views
7,387
Comparisons
3,373
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
643
Avg. Rating
9.0
17th
Views
5,215
Comparisons
3,670
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
626
Avg. Rating
7.3
Top Comparisons
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Also Known As
SOAtestSegue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test
Learn
Parasoft
Micro Focus
Overview
Parasoft SOAtest is widely recognized as the leading enterprise-grade solution for API testing and API integrity. Thoroughly test composite applications with robust support for REST and web services, plus an industry-leading 120+ protocols/message types.SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.
Offer
Learn more about Parasoft SOAtest
Learn more about Silk Test
Sample Customers
Lufthansa, Siemens, DirecTV, NZ BankKrung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, MÂȘller, AVG Technologies
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm46%
Government15%
Manufacturing Company8%
Insurance Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company28%
Financial Services Firm13%
Retailer11%
Manufacturing Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company43%
Insurance Company11%
Comms Service Provider11%
Transportation Company5%
Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. Silk Test and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
389,772 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.