Compare Parasoft SOAtest vs. Silk Test

Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 11th in Functional Testing Tools with 3 reviews while Silk Test which is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 3 reviews. Parasoft SOAtest is rated 9.0, while Silk Test is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Offers the possibility for continuous testing using the server-side (nightly) batch runs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Silk Test writes "An easy to use interface with a recording feature that our business users are happy with". Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with SoapUI Pro, SonarQube and Tricentis Tosca, whereas Silk Test is most compared with UFT (QTP), LoadRunner and Selenium HQ. See our Parasoft SOAtest vs. Silk Test report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Parasoft SOAtest Logo
13,922 views|3,126 comparisons
Silk Test Logo
10,020 views|3,576 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. Silk Test and other solutions. Updated: July 2019.
360,852 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
They have a feature where they can record traffic and create tests on the report traffic.Parasoft SOAtest has improved the quality of our automated web services, which can be easily implemented through service chaining and service virtualization.We can automate our scenarios in a data driven format, which shows there is no rework on scripts. We only need to update the test data and run for a number of scenarios.

Read more »

The ability to develop scripts in Visual Studio, Visual Studio integration, is the most valuable feature.The major thing it has helped with is to reduce the workload on testing activities.

Read more »

Cons
The product is very slow to start up, and that is a bit of a problem, actually.Reports could be customized and more descriptive according to the user's or company's requirements.

Read more »

They should extend some of the functions that are a bit clunky and improve the integration.The support for automation with iOS applications can be better.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
They do have a confusing licensing structure.We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%.The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process.

Read more »

Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
360,852 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
11th
Views
13,922
Comparisons
3,126
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
640
Avg. Rating
9.0
14th
Views
10,020
Comparisons
3,576
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
747
Avg. Rating
7.5
Top Comparisons
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Also Known As
SOAtestSegue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test, Silk Performer
Learn
Parasoft
Micro Focus
Overview
Parasoft SOAtest is widely recognized as the leading enterprise-grade solution for API testing and API integrity. Thoroughly test composite applications with robust support for REST and web services, plus an industry-leading 120+ protocols/message types.SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.
Offer
Read White Paper

Download The White Paper to Learn More

Learn more about Silk Test
Sample Customers
Lufthansa, Siemens, DirecTV, NZ BankKrung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, MÂȘller, AVG Technologies
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm46%
Government15%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
Transportation Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm27%
Manufacturing Company11%
Retailer11%
Software R&D Company9%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. Silk Test and other solutions. Updated: July 2019.
360,852 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email