Parasoft SOAtest vs Silk Test

Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 8th in Functional Testing Tools with 16 reviews vs Silk Test which is ranked 13th in Functional Testing Tools with 3 reviews. The top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "We use the product to test the interfaces of back-end services, simulating different points of sale". The top reviewer of Silk Test writes "OCR recognition and integration with IE are advantages but needs better integration with other tools". Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with SmartBear TestComplete, SoapUI Pro and LoadRunner. Silk Test is most compared with UFT (QTP), LoadRunner and Selenium HQ. See our Parasoft SOAtest vs Silk Test report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Parasoft soatest vs. silk test report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs Silk Test and others in Functional Testing Tools.
270,274 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Parasoft SOAtest vs Silk Test

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%.The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process.It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you.I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses.The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals.From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn’t the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer.

Read more »

Information Not Available
Parasoft soatest vs. silk test report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs Silk Test and others in Functional Testing Tools.
270,274 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
8,080
Comparisons
1,978
Reviews
16
Followers
476
Avg. Rating
8.2
Views
6,683
Comparisons
3,634
Reviews
4
Followers
757
Avg. Rating
7.8
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Smartbear%20software logo
Compared 16% of the time.
Micro focus logo
Compared 11% of the time.
See more Parasoft SOAtest competitors »
Micro focus logo
Compared 20% of the time.
Micro focus logo
Compared 17% of the time.
Big logo 400x400
Compared 10% of the time.
See more Silk Test competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsSOAtestSegue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test, Silk Performer
Website/Video
Website/VideoParasoft
  • Vendor 7779 screenshot 1524945471
Micro Focus
  • Vendor 7619 screenshot 1521912797
OverviewQuestionmark icon
OverviewParasoft SOAtest is widely recognized as the leading enterprise-grade solution for API testing and API integrity. Thoroughly test composite applications with robust support for REST and web services, plus an industry-leading 120+ protocols/message types.SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.
OFFER
Learn more about Parasoft SOAtest
Learn more about Silk Test
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersLufthansa, Siemens, DirecTV, NZ BankKrung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
38%
Government
15%
Media Company
8%
Insurance Company
8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
44%
Healthcare Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Non Tech Company
4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Insurance Company
24%
Healthcare Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Software R&D Company
11%
Company SizeQuestionmark icon
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
20%
Midsize Enterprise
4%
Large Enterprise
76%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
14%
Midsize Enterprise
20%
Large Enterprise
65%
REVIEWERS
Small Business
13%
Midsize Enterprise
38%
Large Enterprise
50%
Parasoft soatest vs. silk test report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs Silk Test and others in Functional Testing Tools.
Download now
270,274 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email