Compare Parasoft SOAtest vs. SmartBear TestComplete

Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews while SmartBear TestComplete is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 6 reviews. Parasoft SOAtest is rated 9.6, while SmartBear TestComplete is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Improved the quality of our automated web services". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SmartBear TestComplete writes "Good regressions tool, SoapUI tools, and cross-browser capabilities". Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with SoapUI Pro, SonarQube and Postman, whereas SmartBear TestComplete is most compared with Ranorex Studio, Micro Focus UFT One and Katalon Studio. See our Parasoft SOAtest vs. SmartBear TestComplete report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. SmartBear TestComplete and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
390,510 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
They have a feature where they can record traffic and create tests on the report traffic.Parasoft SOAtest has improved the quality of our automated web services, which can be easily implemented through service chaining and service virtualization.We can automate our scenarios in a data driven format, which shows there is no rework on scripts. We only need to update the test data and run for a number of scenarios.

Read more »

The solution is great as a record and playback tool. It also has valuable regression testing.The solution helps improve the stability of our product. It also decreases the work of our manual quality assurance engineers.The most valuable feature of this solution is regression testing tools.The most valuable feature is the integration with Azure DevOps.The database checkpoints detect problems which are difficult for a human resource to find.Customer service and technical support responsiveness are high. Everyone is very professional.Test items, project variables helps in managing automation suite and scheduling execution.

Read more »

Cons
The product is very slow to start up, and that is a bit of a problem, actually.Reports could be customized and more descriptive according to the user's or company's requirements.

Read more »

The solution needs more training manuals or some form of online forum for learning. It needs more documentation.The solution needs Mac OS support. Right now, the solution has only been developed to accommodate Windows OS.The artificial intelligence needs to be improved.What is currently missing from this solution is better support for mobile testing.Name Mapping feature should be clearer. Whenever I use it, I do not really know what will work and what will not work.Stability issues occurred only when connecting to the SourceSafe. Sometimes, after getting the latest version, the tool hangs and it should be reopened in order to recover.Increased performance with less memory and CPU usage.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
They do have a confusing licensing structure.We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%.The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process.

Read more »

This is a pay-per-use service that is not expensive, and cost-efficient if you have a small team.The license price for a physical machine is cheap, and for virtual machine, it is very expensive.Our ROI is about $10,000 a year.TestComplete now have come up with three modules (Web, Desktop & Mobile), so based on the type of product for automation, it is adequate to purchase the required module.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
390,510 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
14th
Views
7,387
Comparisons
3,373
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
643
Avg. Rating
9.0
4th
Views
19,765
Comparisons
12,982
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
374
Avg. Rating
8.5
Top Comparisons
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Also Known As
SOAtest
Learn
Parasoft
SmartBear
Overview
Parasoft SOAtest is widely recognized as the leading enterprise-grade solution for API testing and API integrity. Thoroughly test composite applications with robust support for REST and web services, plus an industry-leading 120+ protocols/message types.

TestComplete is a powerful and robust automated testing tool for mobileweb and desktop  applications. Quickly and easily create accurate and repeatable tests across multiple devices, platforms and environments – regardless of experience level. It supports multiple languages, modern control sets and integrates with open source frameworks and tools like Selenium, SoapUI and Jenkins.

Offer
Learn more about Parasoft SOAtest
Learn more about SmartBear TestComplete
Sample Customers
Lufthansa, Siemens, DirecTV, NZ BankCisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm46%
Government15%
Insurance Company8%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company28%
Financial Services Firm14%
Retailer10%
Manufacturing Company9%
REVIEWERS
Software R&D Company18%
Financial Services Firm12%
Retailer12%
Comms Service Provider12%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company32%
Financial Services Firm10%
Manufacturing Company10%
Comms Service Provider6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise67%
REVIEWERS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise38%
Large Enterprise49%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise32%
Large Enterprise54%
Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. SmartBear TestComplete and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
390,510 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.