• Home
  • Parasoft SOAtest vs. TestingWhiz

Parasoft SOAtest vs TestingWhiz comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Parasoft Logo

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 30 Parasoft SOAtest reviews
815 views|564 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Cygnet Infotech Logo

TestingWhiz

125 views|101 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Parasoft SOAtest and TestingWhiz based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Milind Parab
Useful for automated SQA, certifications, but the summary reports could improve
The tool is part of Automated Code Flow. It helps in SQA and Automotive Certification.
Use TestingWhiz?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."
  • "The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."
  • "I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."
  • "It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."
  • "We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."
  • "The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."
  • "They do have a confusing licensing structure."
  • "The price is around $5,000 USD."

    • More Parasoft SOAtest Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Parasoft SOAtest?
    Top Answer:Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports.
    Read all 6 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?
    Top Answer:The price is average. It isn't overly expensive.
    Read all 4 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?
    Top Answer:Tuning the tool takes time because it gives quite a long list of warnings. Going through that is a challenge. It only happens in the initial stage when we are setting up the tool, but it can be… more »
    Read all 6 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    23rd
    out of 47 in Functional Testing Tools
    Views
    815
    Comparisons
    564
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    440
    Rating
    7.0
    38th
    out of 47 in Functional Testing Tools
    Views
    125
    Comparisons
    101
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SOAtest
    Learn More
    Parasoft
    Cygnet Infotech
    Overview

    Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

    SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

    TestingWhiz is a Codeless Automation Testing Tool for Software, Web, Mobile, Database, Cloud, Web Services and API testing. It is pillared on a strong architecture combined with intuitive Automation Engine and short learning curve that promises to take your test automation to the next level.

    Sample Customers
    Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife
    Verizon, IBM, Symantec, VMware, Hyundai, Choice Hotels, Intel, Autodesk, Frost
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm43%
    Government14%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm32%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Government5%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise69%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise75%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 23rd in Functional Testing Tools with 30 reviews while TestingWhiz is ranked 38th in Functional Testing Tools. Parasoft SOAtest is rated 8.2, while TestingWhiz is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Reliable with a good interface but uses too much memory". On the other hand, Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with Postman, SonarQube, Coverity, Klocwork and Polyspace Code Prover, whereas TestingWhiz is most compared with .

    See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.