Most Helpful Review
It can be handled without any knowledge in parameterisation, especially the TestCaseDesign functionality.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Parasoft SOAtest has improved the quality of our automated web services, which can be easily implemented through service chaining and service virtualization.
We can automate our scenarios in a data driven format, which shows there is no rework on scripts. We only need to update the test data and run for a number of scenarios.
If you want something that’s not provided out of the box, then you can write it yourself and integrate it with SOAtest.
Automatic testing is the most valuable feature.
The testing time is shortened because we generate test data automatically with SOAtest.
Every imaginable source in the entire world of information technology can be accessed and used.
We do a lot of web services testing and REST services testing. That is the focus of this product.
Generating new messages, based on the existing .EDN and .XML messages, is a crucial part or the testing project that I’m currently in.
Compared to other tools we have been looking at, you don't have to be a programmer to operate it, though it helps. It also a product that can be used by business people.
We are satisfied with the support of Tricentis.
We have multiple applications, and it supports parallel execution. It has mobile automation.
Multiple scanning engines to automate many different applications.
Object Identification Wizard.
Image recognition: It has allowed us to automate a GUI section of our product which involves drawing different topologies.
Good use in Agile workshops, where the person needs to conceptualize the tests before the developer provides the complete application interface.
The tool can be handled without any knowledge in parameterisation, especially the TestCaseDesign which makes the tool mighty and stable.
Reports could be customized and more descriptive according to the user's or company's requirements.
Reporting facilities can be better.
Compatibility with HTTP 1.1 and TLS 1.2 needs to be improved.
During the process of working with SOAtest and building test cases, the .TST files will grow. A negative side effect is that saving your changes takes more time.
Enabling/disabling an optional element of an XML request is only possible if a data source (e.g., Excel sheet) is connected to the test. Otherwise, the option is not available at all in the drop-down menu.
The feedback that we received from the DevOps of our organization was that the tool was a little heavy from the transformation perspective.
Parasoft SOAtest has an internal refresh function where you can refresh the software to show the changes you’ve made in your projects. Unfortunately this function does not work properly, because it often does not show the changes after you’ve hit te refresh button a few times.
Setup wasn't that straightforward; it was more complex. It all depends on the environment, because there were a lot of errors on our applications. Therefore, it wasn't an easy setup for us.
It needs better integration with JIRA.
I would like a better user interface.
Making it more stable would be good because we get around 90% stability.
The reporting function was lacking in usability and detail.
Security, UI, and basic performance improvements could be done to the product to enhance its use.
Running the regression – if multiple lists are executed at once or if a list contains 200+ tests, it’s a pain to stop the execution.
Might have a learning curve, as it does not follow the traditional Record-Play functionality, but tests have to be built from requirements or Agile story cards.
Pricing and Cost Advice
We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%.
The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process.
It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you.
I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses.
The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals.
From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn’t the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer.
We hired a consultant to figure out all the tools in our company and how they fit in our company before we purchased the solution.
The pricing is high, but altogether it offers you the ability to automate all sorts of applications: desktop, web, mobile, etc.
Expensive, but for long-term projects, it is paying back.
It is an expensive tool compared to other test automation tools. It has a lot of advantages over other tools.
out of 44 in Functional Testing Tools
out of 44 in Functional Testing Tools
Compared 26% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As
|Parasoft SOAtest is widely recognized as the leading enterprise-grade solution for API testing and API integrity. Thoroughly test composite applications with robust support for REST and web services, plus an industry-leading 120+ protocols/message types.|
Tricentis Tosca specializes in enabling large enterprises to improve the quality of their applications by equipping them to optimize, manage, and automate their software testing.
Tosca's model-based approach to software test automation enables enterprises to achieve high automation rates while maximizing business risk coverage.
Tricentis Tosca also provides market-leading test case design and planning capabilities, test data provisioning, service virtualization, mobile testing, and more.
Tosca is fully compatible with other testing solutions and Application Lifecycle Management products. Tricentis also offers uniquely designed testing solutions for SAP, ServiceNow, Trax, Avaloq, and Oracle.
Learn more about Parasoft SOAtest
Learn more about Tricentis Tosca
|Lufthansa, Siemens, DirecTV, NZ Bank||HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone|
Financial Services Firm46%
Financial Services Firm45%
Financial Services Firm25%
Financial Services Firm30%
Comms Service Provider10%