Parasoft SOAtest vs Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Parasoft Logo
1,135 views|777 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Trustwave Logo
views| comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Parasoft SOAtest and Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST).
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Testing (AST) Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We do a lot of web services testing and REST services testing. That is the focus of this product.""Parasoft SOAtest has improved the quality of our automated web services, which can be easily implemented through service chaining and service virtualization.""Technical support is helpful.""The solution is scalable.""If you want something that’s not provided out of the box, then you can write it yourself and integrate it with SOAtest.""We can automate our scenarios in a data driven format, which shows there is no rework on scripts. We only need to update the test data and run for a number of scenarios.""The testing time is shortened because we generate test data automatically with SOAtest.""Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports."

More Parasoft SOAtest Pros →

"The stability is great. We haven't had any issues at all with it."

More Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] Pros →

Cons
"The product is very slow to start up, and that is a bit of a problem, actually.""Reports could be customized and more descriptive according to the user's or company's requirements.""The feedback that we received from the DevOps of our organization was that the tool was a little heavy from the transformation perspective.""The summary reports could be improved.""The performance could be a bit better.""From an automation point of view, it should have better clarity and be more user friendly.""Reporting facilities can be better.""During the process of working with SOAtest and building test cases, the .TST files will grow. A negative side effect is that saving your changes takes more time."

More Parasoft SOAtest Cons →

"I would like to see a little more flexibility with regards to setting up profiles for vulnerabilities."

More Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."
  • "The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."
  • "I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."
  • "It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."
  • "We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."
  • "The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."
  • "They do have a confusing licensing structure."
  • "The price is around $5,000 USD."
  • More Parasoft SOAtest Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports.
    Top Answer:Tuning the tool takes time because it gives quite a long list of warnings. Going through that is a challenge. It only happens in the initial stage when we are setting up the tool, but it can be… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    1,135
    Comparisons
    777
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    440
    Rating
    7.0
    Unranked
    In Application Security Testing (AST)
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SOAtest
    Hailstorm, Cenzic Hailstorm
    Learn More
    Overview

    Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

    SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

    Provides ability to test applications for security vulnerabilities, security policies and regulatory compliance.
    Sample Customers
    Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife
    Leading Health Insurer
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm43%
    Government14%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm32%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government5%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise69%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise75%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Security Testing (AST)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: March 2024.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 28th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 30 reviews while Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Security Testing (AST). Parasoft SOAtest is rated 8.2, while Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Reliable with a good interface but uses too much memory". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] writes "It helps us troubleshoot failed scans and incomplete statuses". Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with Postman, SonarQube, Coverity, Polyspace Code Prover and Klocwork, whereas Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.