Compare Parasoft SOAtest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 13th in Functional Testing Tools with 3 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 15th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews. Parasoft SOAtest is rated 9.0, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Offers the possibility for continuous testing using the server-side (nightly) batch runs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Good integration between the management data and the test cases". Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with SoapUI Pro, SonarQube and Postman, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with LoadRunner, Katalon Studio and Apache JMeter. See our Parasoft SOAtest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Visual Studio Test Professional? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
383,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
They have a feature where they can record traffic and create tests on the report traffic.Parasoft SOAtest has improved the quality of our automated web services, which can be easily implemented through service chaining and service virtualization.We can automate our scenarios in a data driven format, which shows there is no rework on scripts. We only need to update the test data and run for a number of scenarios.

Read more »

The solution is very stable; there's nothing in relation to stability to complain about.The setup is easy and straightforward.Code testing is the most valuable feature of this solution for developing software.We are satisfied with technical support. Communicating with them is very simple. We also have a lot of online resources to check and to study and to train our team with. The documentation is very clear and readily available.

Read more »

Cons
The product is very slow to start up, and that is a bit of a problem, actually.Reports could be customized and more descriptive according to the user's or company's requirements.

Read more »

The database administration could be better; you should be able to choose new tools with the development environment in Visual Studio. It could be easier to use.The data flow can be improved.Enhancing the support for web application testing and load performance would be an improvement.The service right now is far too expensive. You need to pay per user.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
They do have a confusing licensing structure.We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%.The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process.

Read more »

For the cloud services option, you buy a subscription per account or per user. This costs around $52 a month per person.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
383,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
13th
Views
7,279
Comparisons
3,333
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
643
Avg. Rating
9.0
15th
Views
4,588
Comparisons
3,707
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
510
Avg. Rating
8.7
Top Comparisons
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Also Known As
SOAtest
Learn
Parasoft
Microsoft
Overview
Parasoft SOAtest is widely recognized as the leading enterprise-grade solution for API testing and API integrity. Thoroughly test composite applications with robust support for REST and web services, plus an industry-leading 120+ protocols/message types.Visual Studio Professional Edition provides an IDE for all supported development languages. As of Visual Studio 2010, the Standard edition was dropped. MSDN support is available as MSDN Essentials or the full MSDN library depending on licensing. It supports XML and XSLT editing, and can create deployment packages that only use ClickOnce and MSI. It includes tools like Server Explorer and integration with Microsoft SQL Server also. Windows Mobile development support was included in Visual Studio 2005 Standard, however, with Visual Studio 2008, it is only available in Professional and higher editions. Windows Phone 7 development support was added to all editions in Visual Studio 2010. Development for Windows Mobile is no longer supported in Visual Studio 2010; it is superseded by Windows Phone 7.
Offer
Learn more about Parasoft SOAtest
Learn more about Visual Studio Test Professional
Sample Customers
Lufthansa, Siemens, DirecTV, NZ BankTransport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm46%
Government15%
Media Company8%
Manufacturing Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company27%
Financial Services Firm13%
Retailer11%
Manufacturing Company9%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
383,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email