Compare Parasoft SOAtest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Visual Studio Test Professional? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
431,275 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
They have a feature where they can record traffic and create tests on the report traffic.Parasoft SOAtest has improved the quality of our automated web services, which can be easily implemented through service chaining and service virtualization.We can automate our scenarios in a data driven format, which shows there is no rework on scripts. We only need to update the test data and run for a number of scenarios.

More Parasoft SOAtest Pros »

The most valuable features are tools like IntelliSense and ReSharper.Performance-wise, it is a great tool.The most valuable feature is the in-built support for C# and .NET projects.The most valuable features are the SSIS reports, the deployment models, and the ability to interact with other Microsoft tools.The solution is very stable; there's nothing in relation to stability to complain about.The setup is easy and straightforward.Code testing is the most valuable feature of this solution for developing software.We are satisfied with technical support. Communicating with them is very simple. We also have a lot of online resources to check and to study and to train our team with. The documentation is very clear and readily available.

More Visual Studio Test Professional Pros »

Cons
The product is very slow to start up, and that is a bit of a problem, actually.Reports could be customized and more descriptive according to the user's or company's requirements.

More Parasoft SOAtest Cons »

The integration with Git needs improving because it is a bit disjointed and unpredictable.The pricing of this solution should be lowered.We would like to be able to easily integrate this solution with our continuous integration tools, such as Jenkins.The documents on the Microsoft website are not very useful, and they ought to make it easier to find answers.The database administration could be better; you should be able to choose new tools with the development environment in Visual Studio. It could be easier to use.The data flow can be improved.Enhancing the support for web application testing and load performance would be an improvement.The service right now is far too expensive. You need to pay per user.

More Visual Studio Test Professional Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
They do have a confusing licensing structure.We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%.The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process.

More Parasoft SOAtest Pricing and Cost Advice »

I think that the pricing is quite good.For the cloud services option, you buy a subscription per account or per user. This costs around $52 a month per person.

More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
431,275 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
15th
Views
8,130
Comparisons
3,865
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
635
Avg. Rating
9.5
9th
Views
3,878
Comparisons
3,147
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
392
Avg. Rating
8.6
Popular Comparisons
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As
SOAtest
Learn
Parasoft
Microsoft
Overview
Parasoft SOAtest is widely recognized as the leading enterprise-grade solution for API testing and API integrity. Thoroughly test composite applications with robust support for REST and web services, plus an industry-leading 120+ protocols/message types.Visual Studio Professional Edition provides an IDE for all supported development languages. As of Visual Studio 2010, the Standard edition was dropped. MSDN support is available as MSDN Essentials or the full MSDN library depending on licensing. It supports XML and XSLT editing, and can create deployment packages that only use ClickOnce and MSI. It includes tools like Server Explorer and integration with Microsoft SQL Server also. Windows Mobile development support was included in Visual Studio 2005 Standard, however, with Visual Studio 2008, it is only available in Professional and higher editions. Windows Phone 7 development support was added to all editions in Visual Studio 2010. Development for Windows Mobile is no longer supported in Visual Studio 2010; it is superseded by Windows Phone 7.
Offer
Learn more about Parasoft SOAtest
Learn more about Visual Studio Test Professional
Sample Customers
Lufthansa, Siemens, DirecTV, NZ BankTransport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm46%
Government15%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
Insurance Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company38%
Comms Service Provider13%
Government9%
Financial Services Firm5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company52%
Comms Service Provider12%
Media Company9%
Insurance Company6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
431,275 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 15th in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 9th in Functional Testing Tools with 8 reviews. Parasoft SOAtest is rated 9.6, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Improved the quality of our automated web services". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Good integration between the management data and the test cases". Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with Postman, SonarQube, SoapUI Pro, Tricentis Tosca and Coverity, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, TFS, Katalon Studio and Ranorex Studio. See our Parasoft SOAtest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report. /' We've helped 431,275 professionals make an informed decision, / with our validated product reviews, independent rankings, and peer opinions. /.promo-video-link / = link_to('See how it works.', '#', id: 'gitb-video-pane-open', / data: { :'video-link' => 'https://www.youtube.com/embed/RVO4FHQxGVM', :'video-width' => '640', :'video-height' => '360' }) /br

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.