• Home
  • Parasoft SOAtest vs. ZAPTEST

Parasoft SOAtest vs ZAPTEST comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Parasoft Logo

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 30 Parasoft SOAtest reviews
815 views|564 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
ZAPTEST Logo

ZAPTEST

Read 7 ZAPTEST reviews
526 views|274 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Parasoft SOAtest and ZAPTEST based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Milind Parab
Useful for automated SQA, certifications, but the summary reports could improve
The tool is part of Automated Code Flow. It helps in SQA and Automotive Certification.
Anonymous User
The OCR feature allows objects to be identified based on their characteristics. I miss proper help documentation.
I was able to automate an application, where object identifications have impeded any progress in automating the regression bed. With ZAPTEST, we... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."
  • "The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."
  • "I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."
  • "It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."
  • "We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."
  • "The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."
  • "They do have a confusing licensing structure."
  • "The price is around $5,000 USD."

    • More Parasoft SOAtest Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Parasoft SOAtest?
    Top Answer:Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports.
    Read all 6 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?
    Top Answer:The price is average. It isn't overly expensive.
    Read all 4 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?
    Top Answer:Tuning the tool takes time because it gives quite a long list of warnings. Going through that is a challenge. It only happens in the initial stage when we are setting up the tool, but it can be… more »
    Read all 6 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    23rd
    out of 47 in Functional Testing Tools
    Views
    815
    Comparisons
    564
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    440
    Rating
    7.0
    31st
    out of 47 in Functional Testing Tools
    Views
    526
    Comparisons
    274
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SOAtest
    Learn More
    Parasoft
    ZAPTEST
    Overview

    Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

    SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

    ZAPTEST is software test automation solution for testing applications cross-platform. ZAPTEST allows testing any GUI based software on any modern OS mobile or conventional that includes iOS; Android; WinMo; Blackberry; Windows; Mac; and Linux. ZAP 1Script technology allows users to script test procedure once and execute it on any correspondent application on any platform and environment. ZAP MultiRun technology offers execution of the same test script on multiple workstations and mobile devices at once, and expedites time to test execution. zapFARM offers mobile and conventional device management, by using distributed and multi-site devices and management of devices and users. ZAPTEST is software test automation solution for testing applications cross-platform. ZAPTEST allows testing of any GUI based software on any modern OS, mobile or conventional including iOS; Android; WinMo; Blackberry; Windows; Mac; and Linux, as well as supports testing of Agile and CI development. ZAP main technologies are ZAPTEST; ZAP-fiX; MultiRun; and zapFARM With over 15 years of industry experience implementing test automation processes ZAP also offers professional help to allows enterprises with testing best practices implementing ZAPTEST. Using ZAPTEST test automation teams reducing time to test development and maintenance, expedite test execution cross-platform and manage devices under test remotely within organization
    Sample Customers
    Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife
    AT&T, Ally Financial, Inc. Standard & Poors, Comcast, Boeing Employee Credit Union, Nordstroms, Bank of New Zealand, Aviva France, Delta Airlines, First National Bank of South Africa, Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, American Well, SuperValu, 24 Hour Fitness, Inc., Lexis Nexis, Cspire Wireless, GE Intelligent Systems, Accenture, Shelter Mutual Insurance, Agco
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm43%
    Government14%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm32%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Government5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Government14%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise69%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise75%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise56%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 23rd in Functional Testing Tools with 30 reviews while ZAPTEST is ranked 31st in Functional Testing Tools. Parasoft SOAtest is rated 8.2, while ZAPTEST is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Reliable with a good interface but uses too much memory". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ZAPTEST writes "The OCR feature allows objects to be identified based on their characteristics. I miss proper help documentation". Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with Postman, SonarQube, Coverity, Klocwork and Polyspace Code Prover, whereas ZAPTEST is most compared with Selenium HQ, OpenText UFT One, Automation Anywhere (AA) and ReadyAPI.

    See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Test Automation Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.