Compare Parasoft SOAtest vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
431,468 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
They have a feature where they can record traffic and create tests on the report traffic.Parasoft SOAtest has improved the quality of our automated web services, which can be easily implemented through service chaining and service virtualization.We can automate our scenarios in a data driven format, which shows there is no rework on scripts. We only need to update the test data and run for a number of scenarios.

More Parasoft SOAtest Pros »

It’s been really easy to automate the same application TestComplete struggled with. I have been able to automate two of our key applications in just a few months. I haven’t even taken their training.The most valuable feature of AscentialTest for us is that it fully supports PowerBuilder.If you use the PowerBuilder application, do choose AscentialTest without thinking twice.

More Zeenyx AscentialTest Pros »

Cons
The product is very slow to start up, and that is a bit of a problem, actually.Reports could be customized and more descriptive according to the user's or company's requirements.

More Parasoft SOAtest Cons »

The only thing I can't wait for is for Zeenyx to add automating Mobile apps.Classes are not as object-oriented as I would like, but I am a programmer and not QA so I expect a lot.I would like to see an improvement in the User Interface.

More Zeenyx AscentialTest Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
They do have a confusing licensing structure.We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%.The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process.

More Parasoft SOAtest Pricing and Cost Advice »

Once it starts generating ROI, which for us took between three and six months, one will not even think about the investment.

More Zeenyx AscentialTest Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
431,468 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
15th
Views
8,130
Comparisons
3,865
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
635
Avg. Rating
9.5
6th
Views
2,088
Comparisons
482
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
584
Avg. Rating
9.6
Popular Comparisons
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 36% of the time.
Also Known As
SOAtestAscentialTest
Learn
Parasoft
Zeenyx
Video Not Available
Overview
Parasoft SOAtest is widely recognized as the leading enterprise-grade solution for API testing and API integrity. Thoroughly test composite applications with robust support for REST and web services, plus an industry-leading 120+ protocols/message types.AscentialTest™ by Zeenyx Software is an enterprise level Test Management System that encompasses Test Planning, Development, Data Management, Execution and Defect Tracking for applications running on Windows, the web, java, dotNet, terminals and PowerBuilder. This “next generation” testing solution allows users to build robust automated and manual tests from reusable components created by its powerful object recognition engine without recording or scripting. Our patented ‘snapshot’ technology generates graphical representations of the application under test which allows users to build ‘Steps’ by dragging and dropping objects in a visual test editor. Reusable Steps are combined to form a multitude of automated and manual tests that are easy to create and maintain. With AscentialTest, companies realize a dramatic reduction in test creation and maintenance times, resulting in increased productivity and lower costs.
Offer
Learn more about Parasoft SOAtest
Learn more about Zeenyx AscentialTest
Sample Customers
Lufthansa, Siemens, DirecTV, NZ BankTJX Companies, Nuance Communications, Ericsson Inc., Transatlantic Reinsurance Company, Accenture, Nutrition Coordinating Center, Univ. of MN, iConectiv, Fortress Software, and LMP Corp.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm46%
Government15%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
Insurance Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company38%
Comms Service Provider13%
Government10%
Financial Services Firm5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Healthcare Company15%
Construction Company10%
Retailer9%
Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
431,468 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 15th in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews while Zeenyx AscentialTest is ranked 6th in Functional Testing Tools with 5 reviews. Parasoft SOAtest is rated 9.6, while Zeenyx AscentialTest is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Improved the quality of our automated web services". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zeenyx AscentialTest writes "Our university students who enter our tests have found it easy to master with minimal assistance, but classes could be more object-oriented". Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with Postman, SonarQube, SoapUI Pro, Tricentis Tosca and Coverity, whereas Zeenyx AscentialTest is most compared with Selenium HQ, SmartBear TestComplete, Tricentis Tosca, Micro Focus UFT One and Ranorex Studio. See our Parasoft SOAtest vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.