Compare Pavilion Hyperparallel Flash Array vs. Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell EMC, Pure Storage, IBM and others in NVMe. Updated: April 2021.
474,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The pricing is good.""It consolidates a lot of our storage into one or two chassis, which makes money savings in our data center.""We have used the solution’s thin provisioning to add new applications without having to purchase additional storage. We use thin provisioning on all of our flash arrays at this point. It gives us the choice to be able to overprovision and take advantage of compression, compaction, and thin provisioning all at the same time. We can get more out of the purchases that we make.""I would like it to be a lot less expensive, but it's been a very good solution for us.""The price of the upgrading of the solution is high. I could buy a whole unit of All Flash FAS 300 with a shelf for around $285,000. Yet if I want to add one additional shelf, it'll cost me $275,000. So they want you to upgrade by replacing it. It's cheaper to buy a whole new unit than to just scale out. The upside is they last. AFF lasts us three or four years. So that's a good investment.""It definitely reduces costs because it simply takes less power to run these systems. While the SSDs don't take power, they are in general very big right now. So, the running cost has decreased for a lot of our customers.""We benefited from implementing all-flash by reducing our data center footprint. We took it from 30 racks to just over five. This is one of the biggest savings for us.""One of the reasons we like this solution is that all of the features are included with the one license."

More NetApp AFF (All Flash FAS) Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
"We pay approximately $50,000 USD per year in licensing fees.""With VMware, we pay $300,000 annually.""Our licensing fees are $500,000+ USD.""As far as the licensing costs, everything is included in the license.""They can tout the functionality and cutting edge technology that they have, but that's where the price tag comes in. The cost is high, but I think as they grow their business and get more customers that it will probably go down a little bit.""Its price could be better. It is not too expensive, but it is the high-end cost. It is kind of a Rolls-Royce. You pay a lot, but you get a lot out of it. So, the price pressure on the way down would be great, but at the end of the day, if you need to do the work, you just pay for it."

More Pure FlashArray X NVMe Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NVMe solutions are best for your needs.
474,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Well, Is one thing NetApp Storage has vs other brand is the mix of protocol CIFS with NFS booth working together in the… more »
Top Answer: This question is very dependent on your requirements. Both are among the best in the field. Of course, the intended cost… more »
Top Answer: The answer depends on your needs and budget. If you want high performance (who doesn't) or let's say the latency matters… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: It is very easy to install and configure. It has got excellent diagnostics. If you really need to see how the box is… more »
Top Answer: Its price could be better. It is not too expensive, but it is the high-end cost. It is kind of a Rolls-Royce. You pay a… more »
Top Answer: Right now, the box itself is just strictly working as a backend storage system. It would be fantastic if we could access… more »
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
NetApp All Flash FAS, NetApp AFF, NetApp Flash FAS
Pavilion HFA
Pure FlashArray//X NVMe, Pure FlashArray//X, FlashArray//X
Learn More
Overview

NetApp AFF8000 All Flash FAS systems combine all-flash performance with unified data management from flash to disk to cloud.  Leverage the Data Fabric to move data securely across your choice of clouds—enabled by Cloud ONTAP™ and NetApp Private Storage for Cloud. Plus, you get the industry’s most efficient and comprehensive integrated data protection suite, on premises or in the cloud.

Pavilion HyperParallel Data Platform

The Pavilion HyperParallel Data Platform™ dramatically accelerates what organizations

achieve by delivering universally unmatched storage performance, in an incredibly compact solution while reducing data center costs and complexity. Unrivaled flexibility for multiple data types and protocols, along with broad ecosystem integration, ensure that every customer has choice and control.

What is the Pavilion HyperParallel Data Platform

The Pavilion HyperParallel Data Platform is comprised of the Pavilion HyperParallel Flash Array™ and Pavilion HyperOS™. The Pavilion HyperParallel Flash Array leverages a unique, switch-based architecture to create a multi-controller solution that delivers an unmatched combination of high performance, ultra-low latency, and storage density. Pavilion HyperOS is a powerful, purpose-built storage operating system designed to unlock the power of the multi-controller Pavilion HyperParallel Flash Array, which delivers scalability and flexibility that no other solution can offer.

Pavilion HyperParallel Data Platform Data Sheet

Download the Pavilion HyperParallel Data Platform data sheet. Updated: December 2020

Pure Storage FlashArray//X is the world’s first enterprise-class, all-NVMe flash storage array. It represents a new class of storage – shared accelerated storage, which is a term coined by Gartner – that delivers major breakthroughs in performance, simplicity, and consolidation.

Offer
Learn more about NetApp AFF (All Flash FAS)
Learn more about Pavilion Hyperparallel Flash Array
Learn more about Pure FlashArray X NVMe
Sample Customers
Acibadem Healthcare Group, AmTrust Financial Services, Citrix Systems, DWD, Mantra Group
Texas Advanced Computing Center (TACC), Statistics Netherlands (CBS)
Fremont Bank, Judson ISD, The Nielsen Company
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company16%
Financial Services Firm12%
Energy/Utilities Company9%
Retailer8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider23%
Manufacturing Company11%
Financial Services Firm5%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm29%
Healthcare Company14%
Manufacturing Company14%
Computer Software Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider15%
Financial Services Firm8%
Manufacturing Company5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise76%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise77%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise38%
Large Enterprise38%
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell EMC, Pure Storage, IBM and others in NVMe. Updated: April 2021.
474,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Pavilion Hyperparallel Flash Array is ranked 12th in NVMe while Pure FlashArray X NVMe is ranked 3rd in NVMe with 9 reviews. Pavilion Hyperparallel Flash Array is rated 0.0, while Pure FlashArray X NVMe is rated 9.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pure FlashArray X NVMe writes "Excellent diagnostics, intuitive console, and fantastic support". Pavilion Hyperparallel Flash Array is most compared with NexGen Storage, whereas Pure FlashArray X NVMe is most compared with Dell EMC PowerMax NVMe, HPE Nimble Storage, Dell EMC Unity XT, Fusion-io and Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform E990.

See our list of best NVMe vendors and best All-Flash Storage Arrays vendors.

We monitor all NVMe reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.