We performed a comparison between Genpact Cora SeQuence and Pega BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is very stable. There is no downtime."
"The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good."
"Application development is very rapid. A lot of code gets reused while building the applications, which is something we highly appreciate."
"The most important features of Pega BPM are case management and claims management, and soon they'll also be offering claims processing. I also love Pega BPM in terms of performance. It's also one of the very few user-friendly solutions in the market. It may take some time to learn Pega BPM, but once you get a proper handle on it, tracking and managing processes become very easy anytime, anywhere. Pega BPM also has very good documentation you can use to learn the solution. Pega has a community portal that has complete information and explanations, and if you're facing a challenge, you can post your challenge on the community portal and get a resolution at the same time."
"The most valuable feature of Pega BPM is its architecture."
"The stability has been good. We haven't had any issues."
"Fast prototyping."
"The solution is operating well overall."
"There is a feature to accelerate the development so that business analysts can directly create their user stories and assign the task to the developers."
"The most valuable features of Pega BPM are low code, no code, functionality, and easy development."
"The setup and configuration is complex."
"The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more user-friendly."
"The pricing model needs to be improved. Right now, it's too expensive."
"First-time customers will find its licensing tricky. The technical support team for this solution could be faster in resolving tickets."
"Business specific functionality is needed."
"The workflow automation can be slow, so there is room for improvement there."
"In the next release of Pega BPM, they should add more ways to do the customer interaction fields in the portals."
"I believe they simplify the application development. It is still complex. The learning is not easy, it takes time compared to other products on the market."
"The local development approach is good in Pega, however, cost-wise, it's getting expensive. That needs to be addressed."
"Currently, there isn't any feature I want to be added in the next release of Pega BPM because Pega always adds new features that my team welcomes and looks forward to learning. One area for improvement in the solution is the long learning curve, but after that, you'll find Pega BPM easy to use."
Earn 20 points
Genpact Cora SeQuence is ranked 38th in Business Process Management (BPM) while Pega BPM is ranked 3rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 55 reviews. Genpact Cora SeQuence is rated 8.6, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Genpact Cora SeQuence writes "It is a very stable and scalable product without downtime". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Low code with great APIs and good flexibility". Genpact Cora SeQuence is most compared with Appian, IBM BPM, Hubble and Tungsten TotalAgility, whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and IBM BPM. See our Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. Pega BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.