Compare Pega BPM vs. ProcessMaker

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Camunda BPM Logo
32,196 views|20,961 comparisons
Pega BPM Logo
15,157 views|11,288 comparisons
ProcessMaker Logo
204 views|141 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Signavio, camunda, Pega and others in Business Process Management. Updated: August 2020.
431,468 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
Being able to use a Java-based solution makes the product flexible.The interface and the number of connectors that they provide are the most valuable features. The support here, it's kind of okay. But the main thing is with the number of connectors and the UI, the user interface.It has an open BPMIt allows me to present or to demonstrate the business process flow, visually, without having to resort to PowerPoint, Visio, or other products.The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand.The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part.When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version.The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read.

More Camunda BPM Pros »

The workflow designing and integration are the most valuable features. Also, the UI design was pretty easy.The solution's case management is its most valuable aspect.The most valuable feature is flexibility, as we can configure it to best suit our requirements.The solution offers excellent workflows.The solution provides us with a very good dashboard.The most valuable aspect of the solution is the various workflows.The most valuable feature is the situational layer cake.It is easy to use, easy to understand, easy to implement and easy to enhance and we can do it as a Cloud. Also it is very user friendly.

More Pega BPM Pros »

What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities.

More ProcessMaker Pros »

Cons
The solution could use some enhancements like adding connectors, improving forms and having a mobile app, but everything is an enhancement rather than a flaw.The support definitely can be improved. Apart from that, the language should be extendable to other platforms. If I want to write, I'll run a different platform, like Python code on top of it, or COBOL code on top of it, and it should support those languages.Lacking in forms visualization.If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map.Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance.I would also like a very easy to use form builder.I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs.I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution.

More Camunda BPM Cons »

It's called a local platform but on the other hand, it needs a lot of experience. It's not all that easy to click and plug and play. If you really want to use all the features out of this platform, you definitely need a lot of experience and a lot of training to get there.They are currently spending some time on improving the product with respect to machine learning, especially related to robotic automation. They probably could be a little more adept on that area would help.It is not fully compatible with all versions of Internet Explorer, so sometimes, it does not work.There are some UX shortcomings within the solution. However, it's my understanding that they have addressed them and in the next three months they will come out with a new updated version. They will be moving away from HTML5.From a technical point of view, it would be helpful to have some advanced analytics to help with configuration. We have a lot of unwanted features and it would be good to configure it more appropriately so that we are using just exactly what we need.We need more light retail BPM tools within the Pega system. However, Pega is mostly for big companies.Compared to other BPM products, the interface is somewhat complex, so the usability could be improved.Sometimes when we are patching some data from the database, we are getting added as a timeout.

More Pega BPM Cons »

This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects.

More ProcessMaker Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The open-source version of the product is free to use.I use the open-source free version.Camunda is much cheaper.We are using the open-source version of this solution.It is less cost-prohibitive than other solutions on the market. This solution was in our price range.

More Camunda BPM Pricing and Cost Advice »

The pricing is pretty good, compared to other similar products.The price of this solution, including installation and configuration, is comparable to competing vendors.May be somewhat more expensive than other solutions initially, but should have enhanced return on investment.The licensing fees are based on the number of users.

More Pega BPM Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management solutions are best for your needs.
431,468 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 40% of the time.
Also Known As
Pegasystems, SmartBPMProcessMaker Workflow Management & BPM, ProcessMaker BPM
Learn
camunda
Pega
ProcessMaker
Overview

Camunda BPM is a light-weight, open source platform for Business Process Management. It is a perfect match for general software development and provides powerful business-IT-alignment based on BPMN for structured workflows, CMMN for less structured cases and DMN for business rules.

Typical use cases for Camunda BPM are:

  • Straight Through Processing (STP)
  • Human Workflow Management
  • (Dynamic) Case Management
  • Business Rule Automation

Pega BPM helps you simplify and automate your operations so that you can reduce costs and improve business agility. Pega's unique Build For Change technology delivers repeatable solutions that can be efficiently reused and tailored to meet the requirements of diverse customers, product lines, channels, and geographies.

ProcessMaker is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina. The company specializes primarily in developing and marketing enterprise business process management (BPM) software. The company also provides customer support, training, and professional services to larger enterprise customers that require highly customized solutions. The company’s flagship Low-Code BPM product is known for its ease of use and ability for deep customization.

Offer
Learn more about Camunda BPM
Learn more about Pega BPM
Learn more about ProcessMaker
Sample Customers
AT&T Inc., Allianz Indonesia, Deutsche WertpapierService Bank AG, CSS Insurance, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, VHV Group, freenet Group, Swisscom AG, Zalando SE, AccruentThe State of Maine, ANZ, Coca-Cola, Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA), ME, New South Wales, OptumRx, Texas Department of Transportation, UnitedHealthcare Medicare & RetirementTulsa Community College, Sirius College, Mcredit Vietnam, Oregon City Schools, Lakozy Toyota, HyperCube
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider22%
Financial Services Firm22%
Non Profit22%
Construction Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company39%
Comms Service Provider14%
Media Company6%
Government6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm47%
Computer Software Company33%
Insurance Company7%
Real Estate/Law Firm7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company52%
Comms Service Provider9%
Financial Services Firm7%
Media Company5%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business52%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise33%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business8%
Midsize Enterprise19%
Large Enterprise72%
REVIEWERS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise78%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise76%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Signavio, camunda, Pega and others in Business Process Management. Updated: August 2020.
431,468 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Pega BPM is ranked 3rd in Business Process Management with 14 reviews while ProcessMaker is ranked 17th in Business Process Management with 1 review. Pega BPM is rated 8.4, while ProcessMaker is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Good case management and BPM workflow with easy cloud implementation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ProcessMaker writes "Easy to learn, automates our manual processes to make things easier, and saves us time and money". Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Appian, IBM BPM, OutSystems and ARIS BPM, whereas ProcessMaker is most compared with Bonita.

See our list of best Business Process Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.