Anonymous UserFinancial Analyst at a tech services company
Mark MyersVice President Information Technology at Assemi Group
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The most valuable features are case management and integration services."
"While Pega technical support is okay, it also depends on the issues you need help with and who your contact is with Pega."
"Powerful, full-featured business process management with excellent support"
"The solution's most valuable feature is its quick setup. Nowhere else you can create a good-looking application this quick. It's a fairly robust system."
"The interface is quite simple and easy to use, even for beginners."
"The stability has been good. We haven't had any issues."
"It is easy to use, easy to understand, easy to implement and easy to enhance and we can do it as a Cloud. Also it is very user friendly."
"The most valuable feature is the situational layer cake."
"This solution has provided for Rapid deployment of data collection tools, replacing spreadsheets with near real-time data."
"QuickBase is an excellent product and it is very easy to get support."
"The unit testing needs to improve, as well as the user interface."
"What should be included is some UI features and maybe some integrations. This includes documentation on how the UI works."
"Lack of stronger cloud support is somewhat inconvenient for users and implementation."
"The pricing model needs to be improved. Right now, it's too expensive."
"Pega currently is trying to add chatbots to their systems, and it's still quite immature. This part definitely needs to be improved."
"The solution would benefit from more integration capabilities."
"Sometimes when we are patching some data from the database, we are getting added as a timeout."
"Compared to other BPM products, the interface is somewhat complex, so the usability could be improved."
"The mobile app has improved, but it still needs work."
"I would like to see the reporting enhanced because some of them are not easy to generate."
"The licensing fees are based on the number of users."
"May be somewhat more expensive than other solutions initially, but should have enhanced return on investment."
"The price of this solution, including installation and configuration, is comparable to competing vendors."
"The pricing is pretty good, compared to other similar products."
"It's a user-based license where, as you scale the numbers of users, the price increases."
"You have to negotiate the price because it varies based on the number of users you have, as well as how much cloud storage space you need."
Pega BPM helps you simplify and automate your operations so that you can reduce costs and improve business agility. Pega's unique Build For Change technology delivers repeatable solutions that can be efficiently reused and tailored to meet the requirements of diverse customers, product lines, channels, and geographies.
Trusted by more than half of the Fortune 100, QuickBase is a low-code platform for building, customizing, and integrating custom business applications. With more than 6,000 customers and 500,000 active users, QuickBase is the technology of choice for organizations that want to empower business users to solve their own challenges while maintaining the governance and security of an enterprise-quality app development system.
Pega BPM is ranked 2nd in Rapid Application Development Software with 15 reviews while QuickBase is ranked 18th in Rapid Application Development Software with 2 reviews. Pega BPM is rated 8.4, while QuickBase is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Good case management and BPM workflow with easy cloud implementation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QuickBase writes "Easy to use and the support is good". Pega BPM is most compared with Camunda BPM, ServiceNow, Appian, IBM BPM and OutSystems, whereas QuickBase is most compared with Microsoft PowerApps, OutSystems, Zudy VINYL, Caspio and Oracle Application Express (APEX). See our Pega BPM vs. QuickBase report.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.