We performed a comparison between Pega BPM and SAP Signavio Process Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has very helpful technical support."
"The most valuable feature is flexibility, as we can configure it to best suit our requirements."
"Powerful, full-featured business process management with excellent support"
"The solution's case management is its most valuable aspect."
"This is a customizable product."
"It is quite configurable, which is the most exciting feature. We can easily configure it as per our needs."
"The most valuable feature of Pega BPMI would be the academy courses, specifically the Product Development Network (PDN). Additionally, our organization has a dedicated Customer Engagement Team that we work closely with to achieve our goals."
"When our clients automate the KYC and onboarding processes, they can reduce their manual force and then deploy them in much better tasks rather than the mundane activities of selecting forms and gathering information."
"This functionality ("invite anyone for feedback") has substantially increased visibility over work-in-progress when it comes to process modelling and overall process management and it decreased the time spent on giving and receiving feedback through emails and through sharing screenshots/.ppt files/Visio files etc."
"It's way of handling is really an advantage. It's quite easy to use, without too much training . That's the main point for me."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The most valuable feature is probably the nature of it."
"Process Manager is really helpful in building process maps. Creating them is really easy; the program is user-friendly."
"It is a stable solution."
"This product has helped us to work within standards for process planning."
"One of the most valuable features is ease of use which has really been a good thing to put into the business. People like tools that they can just pick up and use straight-away."
"To learn Pega, you need to be a partner. If someone just wants to learn Pega for the sake of learning, they won't be able to do so as they don't give access to that."
"We have experienced a few technical challenges, particularly triggering the workflow through file drops and accessing files."
"The main problem with Pega is that it is quite complex, so it is very difficult for the developer to learn."
"The previous versions had good training documents but the updated versions need to improve the documentation."
"Pega is claiming they're into low code but as per Gartner Magic Quadrant, Pega is not there now."
"First-time customers will find its licensing tricky. The technical support team for this solution could be faster in resolving tickets."
"This is a quite expensive product."
"There is a scarcity of resources who have worked with this solution before."
"It is difficult to quickly digest the vast power of the suite and make use of those capabilities fully."
"The price can be made cheaper."
"Signavio Process Manager needs to have an integrated document management system to better work with processes that rely heavily on documents and document flows."
"It is sometimes difficult to find the match between what is possible and what is wanted, or what is helpful with the product, so better documentation may assist in this regard."
"I would like to see the inclusion of some document management functionality so that we don't need to integrate with a second solution to accommodate this."
"The user management functionality in Process Manager is not as user friendly as the one in the Collaboration Hub."
"There are a few bugs when you use the Microsoft Surface Hub with the big screen."
"I would like to have the option to select the color of items and subgroups in the glossary because right now it is fixed."
Pega BPM is ranked 3rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 55 reviews while SAP Signavio Process Manager is ranked 8th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews. Pega BPM is rated 8.2, while SAP Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Low code with great APIs and good flexibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Signavio Process Manager writes "Has many functionalities and is used to model processes to the former operating model". Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and GitHub CoPilot, whereas SAP Signavio Process Manager is most compared with Celonis, ARIS BPA, Camunda, Visio and BIC Platform . See our Pega BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.