We performed a comparison between Pega BPM and SAP Signavio Process Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Pega BPM has a full suite for any enterprise. It is a process orchestration platform. It has detailed features for case management and workflows."
"It is quite configurable, which is the most exciting feature. We can easily configure it as per our needs."
"The ability to define processes, build reports, and get insights or analytics on data is most valuable. It is a powerful platform."
"The solution is operating well overall."
"There are a lot of frameworks in the product. I use Pega PRPC the most."
"The case management is great."
"It is a stable product."
"The workflows are the most valuable features, particularly for us, because we were attempting to automate processes by utilizing workflows to provide a hands-off comparison between the bot and the human."
"Process Manager supports end-to-end transformation. Students can better understand end-to-end activity and processes as well as how they are run. For teaching, it's process discovery, then modeling, and finally optimization and simulation, partly. Typically, we showcase some simulation of the processes, and this is where we finish. That is why we validate that it's properly designed, but also what are the outcomes of modeled processes. There are also options for discussion on process optimization."
"When comparing my experience with Celonis and Signavio, I can discern the distinctions between these two platforms. However, I'm unable to differentiate between ARAs and add-ons, as that falls outside my scope of familiarity. Regarding Celonis, it comes with its set of advantages and disadvantages. Notably, it boasts robust features like action flows, task mining, and seamless integration with AML programming. Conversely, Signavio lacks action flows and instead relies on action segments and tasks for interaction. This discrepancy is a significant factor setting Selenium and SecureView apart. In the context of Signavio, it offers a combination of BPMN and process discovery, a feature absent in Celonis. This tandem of BPMN and process insight contributes to Signavio’S potency. Meanwhile, Celonis primarily features the process miner tool, setting it apart from Signavio. These variations collectively outline the numerous differences existing between Celonis and Signavio."
"We can use workflow manager to create forms."
"The Signavio tool is very easy to use and it is one of the reasons why I like it."
"The collaboration hub is good because it allows us to share the models that we've captured and to get comments back, and we don't all have to be in the same room, it can be remote and over time."
"The most valuable feature for me is usability."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the portal for spreading it over the organization, the usability, and the workflow generator in the background."
"It is a scalable solution."
"What should be included is some UI features and maybe some integrations. This includes documentation on how the UI works."
"They are currently spending some time on improving the product with respect to machine learning, especially related to robotic automation. They probably could be a little more adept on that area would help."
"Pega BPM's documentation should be improved, especially for freshers or new trainees."
"UI needs improvement."
"Pega's technical support could be better."
"There are some UX shortcomings within the solution. However, it's my understanding that they have addressed them and in the next three months they will come out with a new updated version. They will be moving away from HTML5."
"Compared to other BPM products, the interface is somewhat complex, so the usability could be improved."
"Business specific functionality is needed."
"For me, given I've got a lot of experience working with BPMN and other process management tools, in terms of the interface, I think there's a little bit more that can be improved to match what the conventional BPMN offers. I've been constantly trying to give this feedback to Signavio, to let them know that it needs to be more coherent with the original BPMN version of the stencil."
"I think the intuitive handling is an issue which they should be more focused on, especially as we have issues with the glossary. If you want to implement Signavio within procedures in contact with other software, it's quite difficult to integrate and you will have several points where you have to double and triple the work, because you cannot maintain the data centrally. With other solutions, we can integrate it and have only one data transfer, to import and export with other solutions. A glossary is still limiting us."
"The performance metrics appearing in the collaboration hub needs to be improved."
"It would be beneficial to have a defined leveling or hierarchy system to facilitate better understanding and analysis. More openness and flexibility would enhance its capabilities."
"The solution is complex."
"It could be more flexible from a customization point of view, where the user is able to display only whatever he needs."
"The workflow automation of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The reporting is too slow and there is a limit of 250 processes."
Pega BPM is ranked 3rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 55 reviews while SAP Signavio Process Manager is ranked 8th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews. Pega BPM is rated 8.2, while SAP Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Low code with great APIs and good flexibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Signavio Process Manager writes "Has many functionalities and is used to model processes to the former operating model". Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and GitHub CoPilot, whereas SAP Signavio Process Manager is most compared with Celonis, ARIS BPA, Camunda, Visio and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect. See our Pega BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
