Compare Pega BPM vs. Signavio Process Manager

Pega BPM is ranked 8th in Business Process Management with 7 reviews while Signavio Process Manager is ranked 9th in Business Process Management with 33 reviews. Pega BPM is rated 9.0, while Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Rapid renew structure allows for better implementation over other solutions and aids clients in serving their customers". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Signavio Process Manager writes "Enables us to identify business analysts that are working on two different things and link up efforts". Pega BPM is most compared with Camunda BPM, Appian and ServiceNow, whereas Signavio Process Manager is most compared with ARIS BPM, Camunda BPM and Visio. See our Pega BPM vs. Signavio Process Manager report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Pega BPM Logo
11,925 views|8,953 comparisons
Signavio Process Manager Logo
4,140 views|2,930 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Pega BPM vs. Signavio Process Manager and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
384,324 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The interface is quite simple and easy to use, even for beginners.The solution's most valuable feature is its quick setup. Nowhere else you can create a good-looking application this quick. It's a fairly robust system.Powerful, full-featured business process management with excellent supportWhile Pega technical support is okay, it also depends on the issues you need help with and who your contact is with Pega.The most valuable features are case management and integration services.It cuts down the time taken for coding. Earlier it used take for us four hours to do a particular code. Now this can be done in less than 30 minutes. That's the kind of productivity gains you can get.The user interface and the ease of developing the workflow for an application are valuable features.Decreased time for plane departures and landing, supported analytical insight for planning of three to six month forecasting, and helped with operational decision planning and support.

Read more »

The most valuable feature is that you can customize it completely with all of the attributes that you need.This solution is innovative and simple to use.This product has helped us to work within standards for process planning.The collaboration hub is good because it allows us to share the models that we've captured and to get comments back, and we don't all have to be in the same room, it can be remote and over time.I love the collaboration function, especially the option to invite people who don't have any users on the licenses.It is possible to do the whole drafting process at the same time in Sagnavio so you don't have a double effort of writing it once, arranging it and entering it again.The features I find most valuable are ease of use and the Collaboration Hub.The GUI is very easy to use, where you can sit together with your colleagues, discuss the process, and during these discussions you can build up the model.

Read more »

Cons
Pega currently is trying to add chatbots to their systems, and it's still quite immature. This part definitely needs to be improved.The pricing model needs to be improved. Right now, it's too expensive.Lack of stronger cloud support is somewhat inconvenient for users and implementation.What should be included is some UI features and maybe some integrations. This includes documentation on how the UI works.The unit testing needs to improve, as well as the user interface.The biggest thing I have seen is when going from one version to another and upgrading to the latest version, it takes a pretty long time for an organization to go through an upgrade process. I think that's an area where they can make it a little smoother.There have been some performance scalability issues. Suppose you want to add more users. You go from, say, 800 users to 1,500 users, and sometimes that creates issues for which there is no clear explanation. To fix it you have to escalate it with customer service and sometimes the response is not up to the mark in resolving those issues.It is scalable, but it also interacts with a lot of other systems. I think they thought that the interface to other systems, legacy systems, was its strength, but when problems do occur, quickly diagnosing those problems has been a challenge.

Read more »

We would like a better way to give users the correct permissions for processes, whether to view or design.I would like to see more integration with the process manager in terms of the workflow accelerator.There is always room for improvement is the capability of integration with other solutions.The performance metrics appearing in the collaboration hub needs to be improved.The user administration, the user-group administration, and the license models need improvement.Part of the product that I think can improve is document control. That's currently not even possible. To work with documents we have something of a workaround using SharePoint.Customized reporting can be improved to make this a more versatile tool.I would like to have the option to select the color of items and subgroups in the glossary because right now it is fixed.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
May be somewhat more expensive than other solutions initially, but should have enhanced return on investment.The licensing fees are based on the number of users.They have both on-premise and cloud licensing. If you are a small to medium company, go for the cloud option because that eliminates a lot of the setting up of your DevTest and performance environments, multiple environments, because you can buy that from Pega with the cloud option. So your setup time really goes down. If you're a large company, then you're better off putting it within your company. You have other skill resources within your company to create environments.They need to come up with licensing options. Right now they do have a cloud-based option, but the cloud prices I've seen are much more expensive compared to competing products.

Read more »

I think we're spending about $150,000 a year on licensing costs.I think that the price of the licenses is between $2,000 USD and $3,000 USD per license per year, plus the hub usage. I cannot remember the exact cost, but it is affordable.My client purchased one editor license and the collaboration hub, which covers up to a hundred people.This solution provides really great value for the money.Lower than the competition with highly flexible licensing plans.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management solutions are best for your needs.
384,324 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
11,925
Comparisons
8,953
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
570
Avg. Rating
9.0
Views
4,140
Comparisons
2,930
Reviews
12
Average Words per Review
952
Avg. Rating
8.3
Top Comparisons
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Also Known As
Pegasystems, SmartBPMSignavio Process Editor
Learn
Pega
Signavio
Overview

Pega BPM helps you simplify and automate your operations so that you can reduce costs and improve business agility. Pega's unique Build For Change technology delivers repeatable solutions that can be efficiently reused and tailored to meet the requirements of diverse customers, product lines, channels, and geographies.

The Signavio Process Manager is an intuitive BPM solution for professional process modeling. Whether you want to create current-state documentation or target concepts, the Signavio Process Manager is your best choice for process modeling. Thanks to innovative web technology, you can get started right away and include your colleagues in collaborative design.
Offer
Learn more about Pega BPM
Learn more about Signavio Process Manager
Sample Customers
The State of Maine, ANZ, Coca-Cola, Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA), ME, New South Wales, OptumRx, Texas Department of Transportation, UnitedHealthcare Medicare & RetirementDHL, Transurban, Prudential Life Assurance, Zalando, T-Systems, Audi BKK, 1&1, Bugatti
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm71%
Software R&D Company14%
Retailer14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company33%
Financial Services Firm13%
Comms Service Provider10%
Manufacturing Company7%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm17%
Media Company13%
Energy/Utilities Company13%
Non Tech Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company26%
Financial Services Firm18%
Energy/Utilities Company9%
Manufacturing Company7%
Find out what your peers are saying about Pega BPM vs. Signavio Process Manager and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
384,324 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Business Process Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email