We performed a comparison between Pega BPM and Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Apache and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."Pega is a local platform that has evolved from a BPM perspective. This allows teams using this solution to address complexities without having deep knowledge in a specific development area."
"Pega BPM has a full suite for any enterprise. It is a process orchestration platform. It has detailed features for case management and workflows."
"Can do a lot of things with minimum time and cost."
"It is quite configurable, which is the most exciting feature. We can easily configure it as per our needs."
"The most important features of Pega BPM are case management and claims management, and soon they'll also be offering claims processing. I also love Pega BPM in terms of performance. It's also one of the very few user-friendly solutions in the market. It may take some time to learn Pega BPM, but once you get a proper handle on it, tracking and managing processes become very easy anytime, anywhere. Pega BPM also has very good documentation you can use to learn the solution. Pega has a community portal that has complete information and explanations, and if you're facing a challenge, you can post your challenge on the community portal and get a resolution at the same time."
"Fast prototyping."
"Scalable and stable BPM software with a powerful case management feature. It also has good workflow."
"Overall, the ability to integrate with multiple applications and effective case management is the most valuable."
"Development is easy on the Ultimus platform."
"Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management has good integration with all the other tools we have been using in our company. We use the data that other tools provide in our implementation."
"The way the IDE works with the chatbox and the taxonomy imports could be a little smoother."
"We have experienced a few technical challenges, particularly triggering the workflow through file drops and accessing files."
"Pega is claiming they're into low code but as per Gartner Magic Quadrant, Pega is not there now."
"The workflow automation can be slow, so there is room for improvement there."
"Sometimes when we are patching some data from the database, we are getting added as a timeout."
"I would like to see Pega BPM improve the user experience."
"They are currently spending some time on improving the product with respect to machine learning, especially related to robotic automation. They probably could be a little more adept on that area would help."
"In the next release of Pega BPM, they should add more ways to do the customer interaction fields in the portals."
"We are looking for a feature that can resign and move the process from one step to another step."
"Ultimus is not good at handling cash transactions. They should add a mobile application in the next release."
More Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Pega BPM is ranked 2nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 55 reviews while Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management is ranked 51st in Business Process Management (BPM). Pega BPM is rated 8.2, while Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Low code with great APIs and good flexibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management writes "Integrates well and helpful support". Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and IBM BPM, whereas Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management is most compared with Appian.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.